首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition >Sleeping position and responses to a carbon dioxide challenge in convalescent prematurely born infants studied post-term
【24h】

Sleeping position and responses to a carbon dioxide challenge in convalescent prematurely born infants studied post-term

机译:足月恢复的早产儿的睡眠姿势和对二氧化碳挑战的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: To test the hypothesis that the ventilatory response to a carbon dioxide (CO2) challenge would be lower in the prone compared to the supine position in prematurely born infants studied post-term. To determine whether there were postural-related differences in respiratory drive, respiratory muscle strength, thoracoabdominal synchrony and/or lung volume. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary neonatal unit. Patients: Eighteen infants (median gestational age 31 (range 22-32) weeks) were studied at a median of 5 (range 2-11) weeks post-term. Interventions: The ventilatory responses to three added carbon dioxide (CO2) levels (0% baseline, 2% and 4%) were assessed in the prone and supine positions. Main outcome measures: The airway pressure change after the first 100 ms of an occluded inspiration (P0.1) (respiratory drive) and the maximum inspiratory pressure during crying with an occluded airway (Pimax) (respiratory muscle strength) were measured. The P0.1/Pimax ratio at each CO2 level and slope of the P0.1/Pimax response were calculated. Results: The mean P0.1 (p0.05) and P0.1 /Pimax (p0.05) were higher and the functional residual capacity (p=0.031) lower in the supine compared to the prone position. The mean P0.1 and P0.1/Pimax increased independently of position as the percentage CO2increased (p0.001). There was no tendency for the differences in P0.1 and P0.1/Pimax between the prone and supine position to vary by CO 2 level. Conclusions: Convalescent, prematurely born infants studied post-term have a reduced respiratory drive, but not a lower ventilatory response to a CO2 challenge, in the prone compared to the supine position.
机译:目的:为了检验以下假设,即在早产儿中,对仰卧位的俯卧位对二氧化碳(CO2)挑战的通气反应将比仰卧位低。确定在呼吸驱动,呼吸肌力量,胸腹同步和/或肺活量方面是否存在姿势相关的差异。设计:前瞻性队列研究。地点:第三新生儿单位。患者:在足月后的中位数为5(2-11岁)周,对18例婴儿(中位妊娠年龄31(22-32岁)周)进行了研究。干预措施:评估俯卧和仰卧位对三种添加的二氧化碳(CO2)水平(基线为0%,2%和4%)的通气反应。主要结局指标:阻塞吸气(P0.1)(呼吸驱动)的前100毫秒后的气道压力变化和阻塞气道(Pimax)哭泣时的最大吸气压力(呼吸肌强度)被测量。计算每个CO2水平下的P0.1 / Pimax比值和P0.1 / Pimax响应的斜率。结果:与俯卧位相比,仰卧位的平均P0.1(p <0.05)和P0.1 / Pimax(p <0.05)更高,功能残余容量(p = 0.031)更低。随着CO2百分比的增加,平均P0.1和P0.1 / Pimax与位置无关地增加(p <0.001)。俯卧位和仰卧位之间的P0.1和P0.1 / Pimax差异没有随CO 2水平变化的趋势。结论:与仰卧位相比,足月仰卧的恢复期早产儿呼吸功能降低,但对CO2挑战的通气反应却不低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号