...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition >Continuous non-invasive cardiac output measurements in the neonate by electrical velocimetry: a comparison with echocardiography
【24h】

Continuous non-invasive cardiac output measurements in the neonate by electrical velocimetry: a comparison with echocardiography

机译:测速仪连续测量新生儿无创心输出量:与超声心动图的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective Electrical velocimetry (EV) is a non-invasive method of continuous left cardiac output monitoring based on measurement of thoracic electrical bioimpedance. The objective was to validate EV by investigating the agreement in cardiac output measurements performed by EV and echocardiography. Design In this prospective observational study, left ventricular output (LVO) was simultaneously measured by EV (LVOev) using Aesculon and by echocardiography (LVOecho) in healthy term neonates during the first 2 postnatal days. To determine the agreement between the two methods, we calculated the bias (mean difference) and precision (1.96xSD of the difference). As LVOecho has its own limitations, the authors also calculated the 'true precision' of EV adjusted for echocardiography as the reference method.Results The authors performed 115 paired measurements in 20 neonates. LVOev and LVOecho were similar (534+105 vs 538±105 ml/min, p=0.7). The bias and precision of EV were -4 and 234 ml/min, respectively. The authors found the true precision of EV to be similar to the precision of echocardiography (31.6% vs 30%, respectively). There was no difference in bias and precision between the measurements obtained in patients with or without a haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus.Conclusions EV is as accurate in measuring LVO as echocardiography and the variation in the agreement between EV and echocardiography among the individual subjects reflects the limitations of both techniques.
机译:客观测速仪(EV)是一种基于胸腔生物阻抗测量的连续左心输出量监测的非侵入性方法。目的是通过调查通过EV和超声心动图进行的心输出量测量的一致性来验证EV。设计在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,健康足月新生儿在出生后的头2天,同时通过Aesculon电动车(LVOev)和超声心动图(LVOecho)同时测量左心室输出(LVO)。为了确定这两种方法之间的一致性,我们计算了偏差(均值差)和精度(差值的1.96xSD)。由于LVOecho有其自身的局限性,因此作者还计算了经超声心动图调整的EV的“真实精度”作为参考方法。结果作者对20例新生儿进行了115次配对测量。 LVOev和LVOecho相似(534 + 105 vs 538±105 ml / min,p = 0.7)。 EV的偏差和精度分别为-4和234 ml / min。作者发现,EV的真实精度类似于超声心动图的精度(分别为31.6%和30%)。有或没有血流动力学显着性动脉导管未闭的患者获得的测量结果之间的偏差和精确度没有差异。结论EV在测量LVO方面与超声心动图一样准确,并且个体之间的EV和超声心动图之间的一致性变化反映出两种技术的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号