...
首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing high-dose ifosfamide + GM-CSF vs high-dose cyclophosphamide + GM-CSF for blood progenitor cell mobilization.
【24h】

Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing high-dose ifosfamide + GM-CSF vs high-dose cyclophosphamide + GM-CSF for blood progenitor cell mobilization.

机译:前瞻性随机临床试验比较了大剂量异环磷酰胺+ GM-CSF与大剂量环磷酰胺+ GM-CSF在血液祖细胞动员方面的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Between August 1994 and June 1999, 56 patients were prospectively randomized to receive ifosfamide 10 g/m2 + GM-CSF 5 microg/kg/day (IFO+GM-CSF n = 28) and cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 + GM-CSF 5 microg/kg/day (CY+GM-CSF n = 28). Both groups were comparable for age, gender, diagnosis, disease stage and previous chemotherapy. The IFO+GM-CSF group demonstrated a shorter median interval between therapy and apheresis (10 days (8-14) vs 13 days (8-25) P = 0.002), median number of doses of GM-CSF (9 (7-13) vs 15 (9-31) P = 0.001), median of days with aplasia (0.5 (0-10) vs 6 (0-21) P = 0.001), median days with fever (0 (0-6) vs 3 (0-9) P = 0.006) and median of days using i.v. antibiotics (0 (0-11) vs 7.5 (0-19) P = 0.002). The median MNC yield was similar in both groups. The CD34+ cell yield was better in the CY+GM-CSF group (3.14 (0.9-11.8) vs 5.33 (0. 08-32)) but not at significant levels (P = 0.1). White blood cell hematopoietic recovery was more rapid in the CY+GM-CSF group (16 (10-22) vs 13 (10-24) P = 0.02). Platelet engraftment was similar in both groups. Costs of mobilization and transplantation were almost the same:
机译:在1994年8月至1999年6月之间,有56名患者被随机分配接受异环磷酰胺10 g / m2 + GM-CSF 5 microg / kg /天(IFO + GM-CSF n = 28)和环磷酰胺4 g / m2 + GM-CSF 5微克/千克/天(CY + GM-CSF n = 28)。两组在年龄,性别,诊断,疾病分期和既往化疗方面均具有可比性。 IFO + GM-CSF组的治疗和单采之间平均间隔时间较短(10天(8-14)比13天(8-25)P = 0.002),GM-CSF的中间剂量数为(9(7- 13)vs 15(9-31)P = 0.001),发育不全的中位数天数(0.5(0-10)vs 6(0-21)P = 0.001),发烧的中位数天数(0(0-6)vs 3(0-9)P = 0.006)和使用iv的天数中位数抗生素(0(0-11)与7.5(0-19)P = 0.002)。两组的平均MNC产量相似。 CY + GM-CSF组的CD34 +细胞产量更高(3.14(0.9-11.8)vs 5.33(0. 08-32)),但没有显着水平(P = 0.1)。 CY + GM-CSF组白细胞造血恢复更快(16(10-22)vs 13(10-24)P = 0.02)。两组的血小板植入相似。动员和移植的费用几乎相同:

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号