...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic review
【24h】

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic review

机译:物理干预中断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播:系统回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY QUESTION How effective are physical interventions in interrupting or reducing the spread of respiratory viruses? SUMMARY ANSWER Handwashing, personal hygiene, social distancing, and barrier interventions (masks, respirators, gowns, gloves, and goggles) were effective against all forms of acute respiratory tract infections. They work against all viruses and all year round. We searched The Cochrane Library, Medline, OldMedline, Embase, and CINAHL, without restrictions on language or publication type, for any intervention to prevent viral transmission of respiratory viruses (isolation, quarantine, social distancing, barriers, personal protection, and hygiene). We included randomised trials and cohort, case-control, crossover, before and after, and time series studies that compared physical interventions with each other or with standard practice.
机译:研究如何有效的物理问题干预在中断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播?洗手、个人卫生、社会距离、和障碍的干预措施(口罩、呼吸器、礼服、手套和护目镜)是有效的反对一切形式的急性呼吸道感染。一年到头。Medline、OldMedline Embase,和CINAHL,没有对语言或出版物类型的限制,任何干预,以防止病毒传播呼吸道病毒(隔离、检疫、社会距离、障碍、个人保护,和卫生)。病例对照队列,之前和交叉后,时间序列的研究比较物理相互干预或标准的做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号