...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study
【24h】

Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study

机译:使用定性方法与随机对照试验复杂的医疗保健干预措施:方法论的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective To examine the use of qualitative approaches alongside randomised trials of complex healthcare interventions.Design Review of randomised controlled trials of interventions to change professional practice orthe organisation of care.Data sources Systematic sample of 100 trials published in English from the register of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. Methods Published and unpublished qualitative studies linked to the randomised controlled trials were identified through database searches and contact with authors. Data were extracted from each study by two reviewers using a standard form. We extracted data describing the randomised controlled trials and qualitative studies, the quality of these studies, and how, if at all, the qualitative and quantitative findings were combined. A narrative synthesis of the findings was done. Results 30 of the 100 trials had associated qualitative work and 19 of these were published studies. 14 qualitative studies were done before the trial, nine during the trial, and four after the trial. 13 studies reported an explicit theoretical basis and 11 specified their methodological approach. Approaches to sampling and data analysis were poorly described. For most cases (n=20) we found no indication of integration of qualitative and quantitative findings at the level of either analysis or interpretation. The quality of the qualitative studies was highly variable. Conclusions Qualitative studies alongside randomised controlled trials remain uncommon, even where relatively complex interventions are being evaluated. Most of the qualitative studies were carried out before or during the trials with few studies used to explain trial results. The findings of the qualitative studies seemed to be poorly integrated with those of the trials and often had major methodological shortcomings.controlled trials of such interventions.Multiple, integrated approaches may be particularly useful in the evaluation of t
机译:摘要目的研究使用定性方法与复杂的随机试验医疗干预措施。随机对照试验的干预措施改变专业实践或组织的照顾。试验发表在英国注册的Cochrane有效实践和组织医疗审查小组。未发表的定性研究有关随机对照试验是确定通过数据库搜索和接触作者。两个评论家使用标准形式。描述随机对照试验的数据和定性研究,这些的质量研究,以及如何,如果,定性和定量研究结果的总和。合成的结果。100年试验相关的定性工作这些发表的研究和19。定性研究是在审判之前,9在审判期间,和四个试验后。13项研究报告一个明确的理论依据和11个指定他们的方法论的方法。抽样方法和数据分析不好描述。没有迹象表明定性和集成定量研究的水平分析或解释。定性研究是高度可变的。结论定性研究与随机对照试验仍然少见,即使在相对复杂的干预措施被评估。之前或期间进行试验一些研究用来解释试验结果。定性研究的结果似乎不完整的试验和往往主要方法的缺点。干预措施。在t的评价是特别有用的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号