首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Question 1. Is cerebral function monitoring as accurate as conventional EEG in the detection of neonatal seizures?
【24h】

Question 1. Is cerebral function monitoring as accurate as conventional EEG in the detection of neonatal seizures?

机译:问题1.在检测新生儿癫痫发作中,脑功能监测与传统EEG一样准确吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A term baby girl is admitted to the neonatal unit following concerns regarding abnormal movements noted on the postnatal ward. She is reported to have had tonic posturing of the limbs and back-arching at 10 h of age. As the neonatal registrar on the night shift, you are asked to review the baby and you wonder whether cerebral function monitoring (CFM) of the baby would be an effective and accurate method of detecting seizure activity.Is CFM or amplitude EEG (aEEG) [index test] as accurate as conventional EEG (cEEG) [comparison] in detecting seizures [outcome] in term neonates [population]?A search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE healthcare databases (limits: publication year 1974-current and English language) identified 42 articles (search performed March 2010).
机译:考虑到产后病房中出现的异常动作,足月女婴被送入新生儿病房。据报道,她在10h时就出现了四肢强直的姿势和后弯。作为夜班的新生儿登记员,您需要检查婴儿,但您想知道婴儿的脑功能监测(CFM)是否是检测癫痫活动的有效且准确的方法。CFM或振幅EEG(aEEG)[指数测试]在检测新生儿[人群]癫痫发作[结果]方面与常规脑电图(cEEG)一样准确[比较]?对EMBASE和MEDLINE医疗数据库的搜索(限:1974年出版,当前和英语)42文章(2010年3月执行搜索)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号