...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients
【24h】

Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients

机译:子宫切除术、子宫内膜破坏和levonorgestrel释放宫内系统(宫内节育器曼月乐)沉重的月经出血:系统从个人评价和荟萃分析的数据病人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY QUESTION How dissatsified are women aftertreatment for heavy menstrual bleeding with hysterectomy, first and second generation endometrial destruction techniques, orthe levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena)? SUMMARY ANSWER First and second generation endometrial destruction techniques were associated with greater dissatisfaction than hysterectomy, although rates of dissatisfaction were low after all treatments. WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHATTHIS PAPER ADDS Less invasive alternatives to hysterectomy for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding, such as endometrial destruction and Mirena, have become increasingly popular. More women were dissatisfied with treatment after first or second generation endometrial destruction techniques than after hysterectomy, but hysterectomy is associated with increased length of hospital stay and recovery period.
机译:研究问题如何dissatsified是女性沉重的月经出血的后处理子宫切除术,第一和第二代子宫内膜破坏技术,或者levonorgestrel释放宫内系统(宫内节育器曼月乐)?一代子宫内膜破坏技术与不满超过有关吗子宫切除术,尽管利率的不满低毕竟治疗。WHATTHIS论文增加了微创的替代品子宫切除术治疗严重的月经出血,如子宫内膜破坏和宫内节育器曼月乐已经成为越来越受欢迎。女性不满意治疗后第一或第二代子宫内膜破坏技术比子宫切除后,但子宫切除术与增加有关住院时间和恢复时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号