【24h】

Liberating the NHS?

机译:解放NHS?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Reflecting on the 2006 NHS White Paper, Professor Stephenson (now President of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health) observed that successive reforms stemmed from government determination to ensure National Health Service (NHS) Trusts should break even financially. He implied that this goal might be questionable, not least because children's services were likely to suffer disproportionately. We now have yet another White Paper ('Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS') proposing the most fundamental changes to the health service since its inception. If adopted, these proposals will establish a full healthcare market, with all hospitals becoming Foundation Trusts and being able to expand private patient beds without limit. For patients, 'integrated care' will follow the American pattern with a tripartite model of private ownership and management of hospitals, served by clinician networks and operating on insurance-based principles. While there is no mention in the White Paper of the role of consultants (clearly not seen as an important issue), it is already certain that pay, conditions and employment prospects for many NHS employees, including doctors, are likely to suffer in the name of 'efficiency' savings.
机译:斯蒂芬森教授(现任皇家儿科与儿童保健学院院长)在对2006年国民保健服务白皮书进行反思时指出,政府决心确保国家卫生服务(NHS)信托应在财务上实现收支平衡,因此进行了一系列改革。他暗示这个目标可能是有问题的,尤其是因为儿童的服务可能遭受不成比例的折磨。现在,我们还有另一份白皮书(“平等与卓越:解放NHS”)提出了自医疗服务推出以来最根本的变革。如果采纳,这些建议将建立一个完整的医疗保健市场,所有医院都将成为基金会信托基金会,并且能够无限制地扩展私人病人的病床。对于患者而言,“综合护理”将遵循美国的模式,由临床医生网络提供服务并基于保险原则运作的私有制和医院管理三方模型。尽管白皮书中没有提到顾问的角色(显然不认为这是一个重要问题),但可以肯定的是,许多NHS员工(包括医生)的薪水,条件和就业前景可能会因此而受到损害“效率”节省。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号