首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Evaluating the CSAPPA subscales as potential screening instruments for developmental coordination disorder.
【24h】

Evaluating the CSAPPA subscales as potential screening instruments for developmental coordination disorder.

机译:评价CSAPPA分量表作为发展性协调障碍的潜在筛查工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we assess the potential of three subscales of the Children's Self-Perceptions of Adequacy in and Predilection for Physical Activity (CSAPPA), a measure of generalised self-efficacy, as possible screens for developmental coordination disorder (DCD). DESIGN: We used the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency short form (BOTMP-SF) to identify probable cases of DCD. We administered the BOTMP-SF and the CSAPPA to 590 children in grades 4-8 from four schools in the Niagara region of Ontario, Canada. We used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess and compare the performance of the subscales and the full instrument. RESULTS: The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC), a measure of the overall performance of the test against a diagnostic standard, was good for the full CSAPPA (AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.87). The adequacy (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.85) and predilection (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.87) subscales had performance statistically equivalent to the full scale. Since the adequacy subscale is shorter and has good content validity with respect to DCD, we ran additional analyses on this measure. A cut-point of 24 on this subscale gives a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.97) and a specificity of 0.47 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.51). CONCLUSION: The adequacy subscale of the CSAPPA appears to be equivalent to the full measure for the purposes of screening for DCD. Further research should explore the possibility of adding further criteria to improve the CSAPPA's modest specificity in this role.
机译:目的:在这项研究中,我们评估了三个子量表的儿童对体育活动的自适性和偏爱的自我量表(CSAPPA)(一种广义自我效能的量度)的潜力,作为筛查发展性协调障碍(DCD)的可能。设计:我们使用Bruininks-Oseretsky运动能力简短测试(BOTMP-SF)来识别DCD的可能病例。我们对加拿大安大略省尼亚加拉地区四所学校的590名4-8年级的儿童进行了BOTMP-SF和CSAPPA的管理。我们使用接收机操作员特征(ROC)分析来评估和比较分量表和整个仪器的性能。结果:接收操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积(相对于诊断标准的测试总体性能的一种度量)对于整个CSAPPA(AUC = 0.81,95%CI 0.75至0.87)均有利。分量表(AUC = 0.79,95%CI 0.73至0.85)和偏爱(AUC = 0.80,95%CI 0.74至0.87)的子量表在统计学上等效于满刻度。由于足够的子量表较短,并且相对于DCD具有良好的内容有效性,因此我们对该度量进行了其他分析。在该子量表上的24分界点给出的灵敏度为0.86(95%CI为0.76至0.97)和特异性为0.47(95%CI为0.43至0.51)。结论:为了筛查DCD,CSAPPA的充分性子量表似乎等同于全部量度。进一步的研究应探索添加更多标准以提高CSAPPA在该角色中适度特异性的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号