...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. >Fetal fibronectin (Quick Check fFN test) versus placental alpha microglobulin-1 (AmniSure test) for detection of premature rupture of fetal membranes
【24h】

Fetal fibronectin (Quick Check fFN test) versus placental alpha microglobulin-1 (AmniSure test) for detection of premature rupture of fetal membranes

机译:胎儿纤连蛋白(快速检查fFN试验)与胎盘α微球蛋白-1(AmniSure试验)相比,可检测胎膜早破

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: To compare accuracy of fetal fibronectin (fFN) versus placental alpha microglobulin-1 for detection of premature rupture of fetal membranes (PROM). Methods: Two hundred and twenty pregnant women >34 and <37 weeks were included in this comparative prospective study and divided into two groups according to presence or absence of PROM. The diagnosis of PROM was based on patient's history of sudden gush of water, pooling of amniotic fluid, positive ferning, positive nitrazine test, confirmed by visualization of fluid passing from the cervical canal and amniotic fluid index ≤5 cm measured by trans-abdominal ultrasound. Patients included in this study were examined by sterile speculum for visualization of membranes and for collection of samples (swabs) from posterior vaginal fornix. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of AmniSure test to diagnose PROM were 97.3 and 98.2 %, respectively, compared with 94.5 and 89.1 %, respectively, for fFN test. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of AmniSure test to diagnose PROM were 98.2, 97.3, and 97.7 %, respectively, compared with 89.7, 94.2, and 91.8 %, respectively, for fFN test. Predictive values and accuracy of fFN test to diagnose PROM were statistically insignificant compared with predictive values and accuracy of ferning, nitrazine and AmniSure tests. Conclusion: fFN bedside test is better than nitrazine and ferning tests in detection of PROM, but is not suited for identification of clinically difficult cases with suspected PROM, because, it is influenceable and can give false-positive results in preterm labor, women >34 gestational weeks and after any vaginal manipulation without PROM.
机译:目的:比较胎儿纤连蛋白(fFN)和胎盘α微球蛋白-1检测胎膜早破(PROM)的准确性。方法:本比较性前瞻性研究纳入了220名> 34周和<37周的孕妇,并根据是否存在PROM将其分为两组。 PROM的诊断基于患者的突然涌水史,羊水汇集,阳性转染,硝氮嗪试验阳性,并通过可视化从宫颈管流出的液体和经腹腔超声测得的羊水指数≤5cm证实。本研究中包括的患者通过无菌窥镜检查,以检查膜的可视性以及从阴道后穹ni收集样本(拭子)。结果:AmniSure检测对PROM的敏感性和特异性分别为97.3%和98.2%,而fFN检测分别为94.5%和89.1%。 AmniSure测试用于诊断PROM的阳性预测值,阴性预测值和准确性分别为98.2%,97.3%和97.7%,而fFN测试分别为89.7%,94.2%和91.8%。与FN,硝氮嗪和AmniSure检验的预测值和准确性相比,fFN测试诊断PROM的预测值和准确性在统计学上不显着。结论:fFN床旁检查在检测PROM方面优于硝嗪和蕨类检查,但不适合于鉴定可疑PROM的临床困难病例,因为它在早产,34岁以上的女性中具有影响力并可能给出假阳性结果妊娠周以及无PROM的任何阴道操作后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号