首页> 外文期刊>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. >Vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming prior to diagnostic hysteroscopy--efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming prior to diagnostic hysteroscopy--efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:阴道米索前列醇用于诊断性宫腔镜检查前宫颈灌注的疗效,安全性和患者满意度:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming prior to diagnostic hysteroscopy and to assess impact on pain scores and patient satisfaction. METHODS: One hundred women undergoing hysteroscopy were randomly allocated into two groups. The study group (n = 50) received 400 microg of misoprostol vaginally (self administered) 4-6 h prior to hysteroscopy while the control group (n = 50) did not receive any cervical priming. Primary outcome measured was need for cervical dilatation, analgesia or sedation. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, patient satisfaction and side effects. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the need for cervical dilatation, analgesia or sedation in the two groups (P = 0.25, 0.64 and 0.5, respectively). In addition, there was no difference in subjective patient satisfaction (P = 0.70). However, those in the control group recorded a higher pain score (median +/- SD = 5 +/- 1.8) when compared to those who received misoprostol (median +/- SD = 4.5 +/- 2, P = 0.03). Only two women (4%) had bleeding per vaginum and one (2%) had a slight fever attributable to misoprostol. CONCLUSION: Vaginal misoprostol prior to diagnostic hysteroscopy did not facilitate cervical dilatation. It did effect a reduction in pain scores, but there was no difference in patient satisfaction, need for analgesia or sedation. No significant side effects were reported.
机译:目的:评估阴道米索前列醇用于诊断性宫腔镜检查前宫颈灌注的有效性和安全性,并评估其对疼痛评分和患者满意度的影响。方法:将100例接受宫腔镜检查的妇女随机分为两组。研究组(n = 50)在宫腔镜检查前4-6 h阴道接受了400 mg的米索前列醇(自行给药),而对照组(n = 50)未接受任何宫颈灌注。所测量的主要结局是需要进行宫颈扩张,镇痛或镇静。次要结果是疼痛评分,患者满意度和副作用。结果:两组在宫颈扩张,镇痛或镇静方面的需求无显着差异(分别为P = 0.25、0.64和0.5)。此外,主观患者满意度没有差异(P = 0.70)。但是,与接受米索前列醇的组相比,对照组的疼痛评分更高(中位数+/- SD = 5 +/- 1.8)(中位数+/- SD = 4.5 +/- 2,P = 0.03)。只有两名妇女(4%)每阴道流血,一名妇女(2%)因米索前列醇引起轻微发热。结论:诊断性宫腔镜检查前的阴道米索前列醇不能促进宫颈扩张。它的确降低了疼痛评分,但患者满意度,镇痛或镇静的需求没有差异。没有明显的副作用报道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号