...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics: An International Journal Integrating Experimental, Clinical and Social Studies on Ageing >Adult age differences in the Color Stroop Test: a comparison between an Item-by-item and a Blocked version.
【24h】

Adult age differences in the Color Stroop Test: a comparison between an Item-by-item and a Blocked version.

机译:Color Stroop测试中的成人年龄差异:逐项与阻止版本之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Color Stroop Test is consensually considered as a task to assess the efficiency of inhibitory mechanisms. If the Stroop interference effect is largely undisputed, it is also acknowledged that the size of this effect varies as a function of various task manipulations, such as the task format. The aim of the present study was to compare the size of adult age-related differences in inhibition as assessed by two different versions of the Color Stroop Test: a standard Blocked paper-and-pencil version and a computerized Item-by-item one. Results showed pronounced age-related differences in the interference effect in the Blocked version, but not in the Item-by-item one. These findings are discussed in terms of the characteristics of the tasks. The choice of the appropriate version with respect to clinical aims is also addressed.
机译:因此,颜色Stroop测试被认为是评估抑制机制效率的一项任务。如果Stroop干扰效应在很大程度上是无可争议的,则还应认识到,这种效应的大小会根据各种任务操作(例如任务格式)而变化。本研究的目的是比较两种不同版本的色条测试所评估的成年人年龄相关的抑制差异的大小:标准版纸和铅笔版和计算机逐项版。结果显示,在屏蔽版本中,干扰效果存在明显的与年龄相关的差异,但在逐项内容中却没有。将根据任务的特征讨论这些发现。还针对临床目的选择了合适的版本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号