...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >The impact of fewer hip fractures with risedronate versus alendronate in the first year of treatment: modeled German cost-effectiveness analysis.
【24h】

The impact of fewer hip fractures with risedronate versus alendronate in the first year of treatment: modeled German cost-effectiveness analysis.

机译:更少的影响与risedronate髋部骨折与alendronate的第一年治疗:模仿德国成本效益分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Risedronate and Alendronate (REAL) cohort study provides unique comparative effectiveness data for real world bisphosphonate treatment of osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of risedronate compared to generic alendronate in Germany applying the REAL effectiveness data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated Markov model of osteoporosis was populated with REAL effectiveness data and German epidemiological, cost, and utility data. To estimate the impact of therapy on hip fractures, costs, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs), the analysis included women>or=65 years, treated with risedronate or alendronate and followed for 4 additional years. Country-specific data included population mortality, fracture costs, and annual drug costs, using a German social insurance perspective. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3%. A differential hip fracture relative risk reduction of 43% was applied to risedronate vs. alendronate. RESULTS: The model predicted that treatment with risedronate would result in fewer hip fractures and more QALYs at a reduced cost (savings of euro278 per treated woman) compared to treatment with generic alendronate. Sensitivity analysis assuming 2 years of treatment and equivalence of effect after 1 year show cost savings as well (euro106 per treated woman). DISCUSSION: Whereas previous economic evaluations involving bisphosphonates have mainly relied on efficacy data from noncomparative clinical trials, this study's strength is in the use of comparative effectiveness data from one data source. The magnitude of the cost savings observed were sensitive to alternative assumptions regarding treatment duration, therapy discontinuation and cost of generic alendronate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on "real world" data the analysis supports the first line use of risedronate for the treatment of osteoporotic women in Germany.
机译:背景:Risedronate和Alendronate(真正的)队列研究提供了独特的比较为现实世界中二磷酸盐有效性数据治疗骨质疏松症。客观的分析评估risedronate的成本效益比德国通用alendronate应用真实数据有效性。骨质疏松症的马尔可夫模型进行验证真正的有效性数据填充和德语流行病学、成本和效用数据。估计在髋部骨折治疗的影响,成本和质量调整生命年(提升),分析包括女性> = 65年,治疗risedronate或alendronate和随访另外4年。包括人口死亡率、骨折成本,和年度药品成本,使用德国的社会保险的角度。折扣为3%。应用于相对风险降低了43%risedronate与alendronate。预测risedronate治疗导致更少的髋部骨折和更多的提升降低成本(储蓄euro278 /治疗相比女人)与通用的治疗alendronate。年的治疗和对等的效果后1年节约成本(euro106每个女人)治疗。经济评估涉及磷酸盐主要依靠功效的数据吗noncomparative临床试验,本研究优势在于使用比较有效性数据从一个数据源。节约成本的大小观察关于敏感替代假设治疗持续时间、治疗停药通用alendronate成本。在“现实世界”数据分析支持第一行使用risedronate治疗在德国的骨质疏松性女性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号