...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in Schizophrenia? A systematic review
【24h】

How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in Schizophrenia? A systematic review

机译:有效和快速响应是通用的健康状况如何措施,如EQ-5D SF-36,精神分裂症?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: Generic health status measures such as the short form health survey (SF-36) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) are increasingly being used to inform health policy. They are claimed to be applicable across disease areas and have started to be used within mental health research. This review aims to assess the construct validity and responsiveness of four generic health status measures in schizophrenia, including the preference-based SF-6D and EQ-5D. Method: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Ten databases were searched from inception to August 2009 and reference lists scrutinized to identify relevant studies. Studies were appraised and data extracted. A narrative synthesis was performed of the evidence on construct validity including known groups validity (detecting a difference in health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores between two different groups such as samples from the general population and people with schizophrenia), convergent validity (strength of association between generic HRQL and other measures (e.g., symptom or functional), and responsiveness. Responsiveness was considered by: 1) differences in generic HRQL measure scores in responders/non-responders and 2) correlation between changes on generic HRQL measures and changes in specific measures obtained from patients and clinicians. Results: Thirty-three studies were identified that provided data on the validity and/or responsiveness of the instruments. Most of the evidence concerns the SF-36 and EQ-5D, and for these instruments there was evidence for known group validity. The evidence for convergent validity and responsiveness was mixed, with studies presenting contradictory results. Conclusion: Although the evidence base is limited in a number of important respects, including problems with the measures used to develop constructs in the validation studies, it is sufficient to raise doubts about the use of generic measures of health like the EQ-5D and SF-36 in patients with schizophrenia.
机译:目的:一般健康状况等措施健康调查(SF-36)和简短的形式EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)越来越被用于通知卫生政策。在疾病领域,已经开始适用心理健康研究中使用。审查的目的是评估结构效度响应性四个通用的健康状况在精神分裂症的措施,包括个性化SF-6D EQ-5D。系统综述的文献承担。《盗梦空间》2009年8月和引用列表审查确定相关的研究。是评价和数据提取。合成了的证据建构效度包括已知的组有效性(检测差异健康相关的生活质量(HRQL)分数在两个不同的群体,如样本普通人群和患者精神分裂症)、聚合效度(强度通用HRQL等之间的联系措施(例如,症状或功能)响应性。1)通用HRQL衡量成绩的差异急救员/无和2)相关性之间的通用HRQL措施和变化从具体措施的变化患者和临床医生。研究发现,提供数据和/或响应的有效性仪器。SF-36 EQ-5D,这些仪器是已知的组织有效性的证据。聚合效度和证据响应是复杂的,研究显示矛盾的结果。许多重要的证据基础是有限的方面,包括问题的措施用于开发结构的验证研究表明,这足以引起了人们的质疑使用通用卫生措施等EQ-5D SF-36精神分裂症患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号