首页> 外文期刊>Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems >Assessment of the ecological status of north-eastern Adriatic coastal waters (Istria, Croatia) using macroalgal assemblages for the European Union Water Framework Directive
【24h】

Assessment of the ecological status of north-eastern Adriatic coastal waters (Istria, Croatia) using macroalgal assemblages for the European Union Water Framework Directive

机译:使用针对欧洲联盟水框架指令的大型藻类组合评估东北亚得里亚海沿岸水域(克罗地亚伊斯特拉)的生态状况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1. Based on the inclusion of macroalgae in the European Union Water Framework Directive as quality elements for the evaluation of the ecological status of coastal waters, the suitability of one (Ecological Evaluation Index, EEI) of several previously proposed evaluation methods in the particular ecological conditions of the northern Adriatic Sea was tested. 2. The EEI was assessed for 10 locations (polluted and putatively pristine) scattered along 60km of the western Istrian coast. The sampling was performed seasonally at 1 and 3m depth by destructive (determination of species cover and biomass) and non-destructive (determination of species coverage using digital photography) methods. 3. When assessed at 1m depth the spatial scale weighted EEI for the west Istrian coast was 8.1, corresponding to an ecological status class (ESC) value of high. However, data for 3m depth gave a spatial EEI of 6.72 which corresponds to an ESC value of good. Regressions of the ratio of ecological state group I (ESG I, i.e. thick leathery, calcareous and crustose species) over total algal abundance with the pollution gradient (obtained using principal components analysis (PCA) ordination of environmental variables) were significant at 3m but not at 1m depth. This was due to the high abundance of ESG I macroalgae Corallina elongata and Cystoseira compressa at 1m depth at polluted stations. Similar regressions were obtained using cover, biomass and coverage. 4. It is concluded that the EEI method may be suitable for the classification of coastal waters in the northern Adriatic only in certain cases. A better assessment of ecological status using this method would require more realistic estimations based on the inclusion of data from several sampling depths. As all three abundance measures (cover, biomass, coverage) gave similar results, coverage (using digital photography) is suggested as being a preferred measure owing to the rapidity of sampling at several depths and less time-consuming laboratory work.
机译:1.基于将大型藻类纳入欧盟水框架指令中作为评估沿海水域生态状况的质量要素,先前提出的几种评估方法中的一种(生态评估指数,EEI)在特定生态环境中的适用性对亚得里亚海北部的条件进行了测试。 2.对EEI进行了评估,评估了伊斯特拉西部沿海60公里处散布的10个地点(被污染的和原始的)。季节性采样采用破坏性(确定物种覆盖率和生物量)和非破坏性(使用数字摄影确定物种覆盖率)方法,分别在1和3m深度进行。 3.在1m深度进行评估时,伊斯特拉西部海岸的空间尺度加权EEI为8.1,对应于较高的生态状况等级(ESC)值。但是,深度为3m的数据给出的空间EEI为6.72,对应的ESC值为good。在3m处,生态状态组I(ESG I,即厚革质,钙质和甲壳类)与总藻类丰度的比率随污染梯度(使用主成分分析(PCA)排序)的回归显着,但不显着在1m深度。这是由于受污染站的1m深度的ESG I大型藻类Corallina elongata和Cystoseira compressa的丰度很高。使用覆盖率,生物量和覆盖率也获得了类似的回归。 4.结论是,仅在某些情况下,EEI方法可能适用于亚得里亚海北部的沿海水域分类。使用这种方法更好地评估生态状况,将需要根据来自多个采样深度的数据进行更现实的估计。由于所有三个丰度度量(覆盖率,生物量,覆盖率)均得出相似的结果,因此建议使用覆盖率(使用数字摄影),因为在多个深度进行采样的速度很快,而且实验室工作耗时少,因此覆盖率是首选的度量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号