...
首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Is the non-respect of ethical principles by health professionals during first-trimester sonographic Down syndrome screening damaging to patient autonomy?
【24h】

Is the non-respect of ethical principles by health professionals during first-trimester sonographic Down syndrome screening damaging to patient autonomy?

机译:是依照道德原则的健康吗专业人士在对于妊娠前三个月的超声唐氏综合症筛查损害病人自治?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the understanding of health professionals involved in first-trimester ultrasound screening of the ethical stakes involved by addressing three questions regarding: how much these professionals know about Down syndrome screening by nuchal translucency thickness measurement; their personal opinion with respect to this screening test; and their attitude with respect to their patients, in order to answer the question: 'Are ethical principles respected when women are proposed ultrasound screening during the first trimester of pregnancy?' METHODS: We studied the medical population in the east part of France by sending a questionnaire to each of 460 medical correspondents. This questionnaire attempted to evaluate the respondent's level of medical knowledge, their personal opinion with respect to first-trimester screening and their attitude towards their patients. We adapted the three-dimensional diagram designed by Marteau et al. to develop a measure of informed choice regarding screening. Only health professionals who were relatively well informed and adopted an autonomy-oriented approach were considered to be in a position to obtain true consent from their patients, respecting ethical principles in terms of competence and the autonomy of patients. RESULTS: We received 276 (60%) responses to the questionnaire. Only 31.9% of health professionals had an approach that facilitated obtaining true consent from their patients and respected the ethical principles of competence and patient autonomy; 46% were in favor of the screening test and adopted an autonomy-oriented approach but were poorly informed; and 15.4% had a directive-authoritarian approach combined with poor knowledge. Regression analysis showed that two independent factors (speciality (P = 0.031) and location of practice (P = 0.034)) affected the level of medical knowledge, and two independent factors (location of practice (P = 0.034) and the type of medical practice i.e. public or private (P < 0.05)) affected the opinion of health professionals about the screening test. Two independent factors (speciality (P < 0.001) and the age of the health professional (P = 0.02)) affected the attitudes of health professionals towards their patients. CONCLUSION: The answer to the question 'Are ethical principles respected when women are proposed ultrasound screening during the first trimester of pregnancy?' is clearly 'No'. Major effort is required to ensure that the decisions made by patients are based on a possibility of true choice.
机译:目的:评价的理解卫生专业人员参与对于妊娠前三个月超声筛查的道德风险通过处理涉及三个问题:这些专业人士知道多少综合征筛查的颈背的半透明厚度测量;关于这个筛选试验;态度对他们的病人,在秩序回答这个问题:“是道德原则受人尊敬的女性提出了超声波在妊娠前三个月的筛查怀孕吗?”法国东部的人口通过发送问卷调查的460名医疗记者。被申请人的医疗水平进行评估知识,对他们的个人意见对于妊娠前三个月筛查和自己的态度向他们的病人。设计的三维图Marteau等人发展的明智选择关于筛选。相对见多识广,采取了谁autonomy-oriented方法被认为是能够从他们获得真正的同意病人,尊重道德原则的的能力和病人的自主权。结果:我们收到276(60%)的反应问卷调查。有一个方法,促进获得真实的吗同意从病人和尊重道德原则的能力和耐心自治;但是,采取一种autonomy-oriented方法通知很差;directive-authoritarian方法结合可怜的知识。两个独立因素(专业(P = 0.031)实践和位置(P = 0.034))的影响医学知识的水平,和两个独立因素(位置的练习(P =0.034)和医疗实践的类型即。公共或私人(P < 0.05))的影响卫生专业人员的意见筛选试验。(专业(P < 0.001),健康的时代专业(P = 0.02))的态度的影响对病人的健康专业人士。结论:这个问题的答案的道德原则尊重女性在第一个提出超声筛查怀孕三个月吗?还需努力确保决策由病人的可能性真正的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号