首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >A randomized trial of assessment of efficacy of leukapheresis volumes, 8 liters vs 12 liters.
【24h】

A randomized trial of assessment of efficacy of leukapheresis volumes, 8 liters vs 12 liters.

机译:评估白细胞分离术功效的随机试验,分别为8升和12升。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is logical to expect that large-volume leukapheresis may be able to collect adequate numbers of PBSC with fewer procedures. To date, there is no agreement on the optimal volume of leukapheresis. Therefore, in this study we compared 8 l volume with 12 l and assessed whether a 50% increase in the blood volume processed would decrease the number of leukaphereses each patient needed to collect >/=2.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in normal mobilizers. PBSC mobilization was done with cyclophosphamide etoposide followed by rhG-CSF in all patients. Forty patients were randomized to undergo 8 l leukaphereses (n = 20 patients) or 12 l leukaphereses (n = 20). The median numbers of leukaphereses required in order to collect >/=2.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in patients processed with 8 l and 12 l were 1 (range 1-5) and 1 (1-4), respectively (P = 0.50). The median number of total nucleated cells (TNC) collected per patient was greater for the 12 l group (7.47 x 10(8)/kg vs 3.90 x 10(8)/kg, P < 0.001), as was the median number of total mononuclear cells (TMNC) (4.26 x 10(8)/kg vs 2.16 x 10(8)/kg, P < 0.001), whereas there was no difference between the two groups for the median number of CD34(+)cells collected per patient (8.94 x 10(6)/kg vs 8.60 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.85). The TNCs and TMNCs collected per leukapheresis were again greater for the 12 l group (3.64 x 10(8)/kg vs 1.91 x 10(8)/kg, P = 0.001 and 2.17 x 10(8)/kg vs 0.88 x 10(8)/kg, P < 0.001), whereas there was no difference between the two groups for the median number of CD34(+) cells collected per leukapheresis (3.98 x 10(6)/kg vs 3.26 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.90). This study showed that there is no difference between 8 l and 12 l volumes in regard to collected CD34(+) cells/kg and also the use of a 12 l leukapheresis volume did not decrease the number of leukaphereses performed compared with a 8 l leukapheresis volume. In fact, the use of the larger leukapheresis volume had the disadvantage of adding 60 min to the time the patient was on the machine.
机译:可以合理地预期,大容量白细胞分离术可以通过较少的程序收集足够数量的PBSC。迄今为止,关于白细胞分离术的最佳量尚无共识。因此,在这项研究中,我们将8升和12升的容量进行了比较,并评估了处理的血容量增加50%是否会减少每位患者收集> / = 2.5 x 10(6)CD34(+)细胞所需的白血球数量/ kg(正常动员者)。在所有患者中,先用环磷酰胺依托泊苷动员PBSC,再用rhG-CSF进行动员。 40名患者随机接受8升白血球(n = 20例)或12升白血球(n = 20)。用8升和12升处理的患者中收集> / = 2.5 x 10(6)CD34(+)细胞/ kg所需的白细胞的中位数为1(范围1-5)和1(1-4) ,分别为(P = 0.50)。 12 l组每位患者收集的总有核细胞(TNC)的中位数更大(7.47 x 10(8)/ kg对3.90 x 10(8)/ kg,P <0.001),总单核细胞(TMNC)(4.26 x 10(8)/ kg与2.16 x 10(8)/ kg,P <0.001),而两组之间收集的CD34(+)细胞的中位数没有差异每位患者(8.94 x 10(6)/ kg与8.60 x 10(6)/ kg,P = 0.85)。对于12升组,每次白细胞清除术收集的TNC和TMNC再次更大(3.64 x 10(8)/ kg对1.91 x 10(8)/ kg,P = 0.001和2.17 x 10(8)/ kg对0.88 x 10 (8)/ kg,P <0.001),而两组之间每位白细胞清除术收集的CD34(+)细胞的中位数没有差异(3.98 x 10(6)/ kg与3.26 x 10(6)/公斤,P = 0.90)。这项研究表明,收集到的CD34(+)细胞/ kg体积在8升和12升之间没有差异,并且与8升白血球清除术相比,使用12升白血球清除术并没有减少白血球的数量。卷。实际上,使用较大的白细胞去除术的缺点是患者在机器上的时间增加了60分钟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号