首页> 外文期刊>The American Economic Review: Insights >Does Biology Drive Child Penalties? Evidence from Biological and Adoptive Families
【24h】

Does Biology Drive Child Penalties? Evidence from Biological and Adoptive Families

机译:生物驱动的孩子惩罚吗?生物和收养家庭

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper investigates whether the impact of children on the labor market outcomes of women relative to men-child penalties - can be explained by the biological links between mother and child. We estimate child penalties in biological and adoptive families using event studies around the arrival of children and almost 40 years of adoption data from Denmark. Short-run child penalties are slightly larger for biological mothers than for adoptive mothers, but their long-run child penalties are virtually identical and precisely estimated. This suggests that biology is not a key driver of child-related gender gaps.
机译:本文研究的影响儿童妇女劳动力市场的结果相对于men-child处罚-可以解释生物的母亲之间的联系和孩子。生物和收养家庭使用事件研究孩子的到来,几乎左右采用40年的数据来自丹麦。孩子惩罚略大生物的母亲比养母,但是几乎是他们长期的孩子的处罚相同的和精确的估计。生物学不是跟小孩有关的一个关键推动力性别差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号