首页> 外文期刊>Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences >A (not so) dangerous method: pXRF vs. EPMA-WDS analyses of copper-based artefacts
【24h】

A (not so) dangerous method: pXRF vs. EPMA-WDS analyses of copper-based artefacts

机译:一种(并非如此)危险的方法:pXRF与EPMA-WDS对铜制品的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Analysis of metal objects with portable and hand-held X-ray fluorescence spectrometry has become increasingly popular in recent years. Here, methodological concerns that apply to non-destructive, surface examination with XRF instruments of ancient metal artefacts are discussed based on the comparative analyses of a set of copper-based objects by means of portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) and electron probe microanalyser (EPMA). The analytical investigation aims to explore issues of instrument comparability and reliability of the non-invasive pXRF results. The different analytical approaches produce a comparable pattern for the major element concentrations, but substantial variation is evident when it comes to the absolute values for major and minor/trace elements.
机译:近年来,使用便携式和手持式X射线荧光光谱仪分析金属物体已变得越来越流行。在此,基于便携式X射线荧光(pXRF)和电子探针显微分析仪对一组铜基物体的比较分析,讨论了适用于XRF仪器对古代金属制品进行无损表面检查的方法学问题(EPMA)。分析研究旨在探讨无创pXRF结果的仪器可比性和可靠性问题。不同的分析方法对主要元素浓度产生了可比的模式,但是当涉及主要和次要/痕量元素的绝对值时,明显的变化是显而易见的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号