首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Medical Nutrition Terminology and Regulations in the United States and Europe-A Scoping Review: Report of the ISPOR Nutrition Economics Special Interest Group
【24h】

Medical Nutrition Terminology and Regulations in the United States and Europe-A Scoping Review: Report of the ISPOR Nutrition Economics Special Interest Group

机译:营养医学术语和规定美国和欧洲范围点评:ISPOR营养经济学特别报告利益集团

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The term medical nutrition ( MN) refers to nutritional products used under medical supervision to manage disease- or condition-related dietary needs. Standardized MN definitions, aligned with regulatory definitions, are needed to facilitate outcomes research and economic evaluation of interventions with MN. Objectives: Ascertain how MN terms are defined, relevant regulations are applied, and to what extent MN is valued. Methods: ISPOR's Nutrition Economics Special Interest Group conducted a scoping review of scientific literature on European and US MN terminology and regulations, published between January 2000 and August 2015, and pertinent professional and regulatory Web sites. Data were extracted, reviewed, and reconciled using two-person teams in a two-step process. The literature search was updated before manuscript completion. Results: Of the initial 1687 literature abstracts and 222 Web sites identified, 459 records were included in the analysis, of which 308 used MN terms and 100 provided definitions. More than 13 primary disease groups as per International Classification of Disease, Revision 10 categories were included. The most frequently mentioned and defined terms were enteral nutrition and malnutrition. Less than 5% of the records referenced any MN regulation. The health economic impact of MN was rarely and insufficiently (n = 19 [4.1%]) assessed, although an increase in economic analyses was observed. Conclusions: MN terminology is not consistently defined, relevant European and US regulations are rarely cited, and economic evaluations are infrequently conducted. We recommend adopting consensus MN terms and definitions, for example, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism consensus guideline 2017, as a foundation for developing reliable and standardized medical nutrition economic methodologies.
机译:背景:医疗营养(MN)这个词是指营养产品进行医学使用监督管理——或者疾病与饮食的需要。定义、与监管的定义需要促进研究和结果经济评价与MN干预。目的:确定MN术语是如何定义的,应用有关规定,什么MN的程度。特殊利益集团进行了经济学范围的科学文献欧洲和美国MN术语和规定,2000年1月至2015年8月出版和相关的专业和管理网络网站。协调使用两步两人团队的过程。手稿完成。1687文献摘要和222网站确认,459条记录中分析,其中308 MN 100条款和使用提供了定义。按国际疾病组疾病分类修订10类被包括在内。肠内营养和定义条款营养不良。引用任何MN监管。锰的影响很少,不够(n =19[4.1%])评估,尽管增加经济分析是观察。定义术语不一致,相关的欧洲和美国的规定很少被人提及很少进行经济评估。我们建议采用MN条款和共识定义,例如,欧洲社会临床营养和新陈代谢的共识指导2017年发展的基础可靠的和标准化的医学营养经济方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号