首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic analysis of knee rotational stability after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
【24h】

Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic analysis of knee rotational stability after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

机译:三维运动学和动力学分析单,后膝关节旋转稳定性double-bundle前交叉韧带重建。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To investigate whether anatomic restoration of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) functional bundles results in significant reduction in transverse-plane instability compared with the conventional single-bundle technique during a dynamic 60 degrees pivoting maneuver with the supporting knee in extension. METHODS: Using an 8-camera optoelectronic system and a force plate, we examined 10 patients with double-bundle ACL reconstruction, 12 patients with single-bundle reconstruction, 10 ACL-deficient subjects, and 10 healthy control individuals. The 4 groups did not differ in terms of age, body mass index, duration of follow-up, and number of meniscectomies performed. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected from these subjects while performing a pivoting maneuver on each side with the supporting knee in extension. Maximum range of motion for internal-external knee rotation and maximum knee rotational moment were examined. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in tibial rotation either between the 4 groups or between sides. The mean knee rotation for the single- and double-bundle groups was lower than the control group. Rotational moment values were substantially reduced on the affected side of the reconstructed and the ACL-deficient groups. However, rotational moment was not found to affect the degree of angular displacement significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction does not reduce knee rotation further compared with the single-bundle reconstruction technique. The affected side of ACL-deficient or -reconstructed individuals is subjected to reduced knee rotational moments compared with the intact side during stressful functional maneuvers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
机译:目的:调查是否解剖前交叉韧带的修复(ACL)功能包的结果意义重大减少截面不稳定相比之下,传统的单包技术在动态旋转60度机动支持扩展的膝盖。方法:使用一个8相机光电系统和一个力板,我们检查了10个病人double-bundle ACL重建12例与单包重建、10ACL-deficient主题,和10个健康控制个人。年龄、身体质量指数、持续时间的随访中,的数量和半月板切除术。并从这些动态数据收集受试者在进行旋转操作每一方支持扩展的膝盖。最大范围的内部运动膝盖和最大旋转膝盖转动力矩被检查。在胫骨旋转之间的差异4组或双方之间。单-和double-bundle团体低于对照组。价值观影响大大降低一边的重建和ACL-deficient组。影响程度的角位移显著。重建不减少膝关节旋转进一步与单包重建技术。ACL-deficient或重建的个人受到降低膝盖转动的时刻在压力与完整的一边功能操作。第三,回顾性对比研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号