首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Efficacy of trovafloxacin in treatment of experimental staphylococcal or streptococcal endocarditis.
【24h】

Efficacy of trovafloxacin in treatment of experimental staphylococcal or streptococcal endocarditis.

机译:曲伐沙星在治疗实验性葡萄球菌或链球菌性心内膜炎中的功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The efficacy of trovafloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and viridans group streptococci was investigated in vitro and in an experimental model of endocarditis. The MICs at which trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin inhibited 90% of clinical isolates of such bacteria (MIC90s) were (i) 0.03 and 2 mg/liter, respectively, for 30 ciprofloxacin-susceptible S. aureus isolates, (ii) 32 and 128 mg/liter, respectively, for 20 ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus isolates, and (iii) 0.25 and 8 mg/liter, respectively, for 28 viridans group streptococci. Rats with aortic vegetations were infected with either of two ciprofloxacin-susceptible but methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains (strains COL and P8), one penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus sanguis strain, or one penicillin-resistant Streptococcus mitis strain. Rats were treated for 3 or 5 days with doses that resulted in kinetics that simulated those achieved in humans with trovafloxacin (200 mg orally once a day), ciprofloxacin (750 mg orally twice a day), vancomycin (1 g intravenously twice a day), or ceftriaxone (2 g intravenously once a day). Against the staphylococci, the activities of both trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin were equivalent to that of vancomycin, and treatment of endocarditis with these drugs was successful (P < 0.05). However, ciprofloxacin selected for resistant derivatives in vitro and in vivo, whereas trovafloxacin was 10 to 100 times less prone than ciprofloxacin to select for resistance in vitro and did not select for resistance in vivo. Against the two streptococcal isolates, trovafloxacin significantly (P < 0.05) decreased bacterial counts in the vegetations but was less effective than the control drug, ceftriaxone. Thus, a simulated oral dose of trovafloxacin (200 mg per day) was effective against ciprofloxacin-susceptible staphylococci and was less likely than ciprofloxacin to select for resistance. The simulated oral dose of trovafloxacin also had some activity against streptococcal endocarditis, but optimal treatment of infections caused by such organisms might require higher doses of the drug.
机译:在体外和心内膜炎的实验模型中研究了曲伐沙星对金黄色葡萄球菌和绿豆类链球菌的疗效。环丙沙星和环丙沙星抑制90%的此类细菌临床分离株(MIC90)的MIC(i)为30.对环丙沙星敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌分离株分别为(0.03)和2 mg / L,(ii)32和128 mg /对于环丙沙星耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌分离株,每升分别为20升/升;对于28个vi虫类链球菌,分别为(iii)0.25和8 mg /升。用两种对环丙沙星敏感但耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株(COL和P8菌株),一种对青霉素易感的血链球菌菌株或一种对青霉素耐性的链球菌微生物菌株感染主动脉植被的大鼠。对大鼠进行3或5天的剂量治疗,所产生的动力学模拟在人类中使用曲伐沙星(每天口服200 mg),环丙沙星(每天两次口服750 mg),万古霉素(每天两次静脉注射1g)在人体中获得的动力学。或头孢曲松(每天2 g,每天一次)。对葡萄球菌而言,曲伐沙星和环丙沙星的活性与万古霉素相当,并且用这些药物治疗心内膜炎是成功的(P <0.05)。但是,环丙沙星在体外和体内均被选作耐药性衍生物,而曲伐沙星在体外选择耐药性的倾向性比环丙沙星低10至100倍,而在体内则没有选择。针对两种链球菌分离株,曲伐沙星显着(P <0.05)减少了植被中的细菌数量,但效果不如对照药物头孢曲松。因此,模拟的口服剂量的曲伐沙星(每天200 mg)对环丙沙星敏感的葡萄球菌有效,并且比环丙沙星选择耐药性的可能性更低。曲伐沙星的模拟口服剂量也对链球菌性心内膜炎具有一定的活性,但是对由此类生物体引起的感染的最佳治疗可能需要更高剂量的药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号