...
【24h】

Biomechanical advantages of triple-loaded suture anchors compared with double-row rotator cuff repairs.

机译:triple-loaded缝合的生物力学优势双排肌腱套相比锚维修。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the strength and suture-tendon interface security of various suture anchors triply and doubly loaded with ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene-containing sutures and to evaluate the relative effectiveness of placing these anchors in a single-row or double-row arrangement by cyclic loading and then destructive testing. METHODS: The infraspinatus muscle was reattached to the original humeral footprint by use of 1 of 5 different repair patterns in 40 bovine shoulders. Two single-row repairs and three double-row repairs were tested. High-strength sutures were used for all repairs. Five groups were studied: group 1, 2 triple-loaded screw suture anchors in a single row with simple stitches; group 2, 2 triple-loaded screw anchors in a single row with simple stitches over a fourth suture passed perpendicularly ("rip-stop" stitch); group 3, 2 medial and 2 lateral screw anchors with a single vertical mattress stitch passed from the medial anchors and 2 simple stitches passed from the lateral anchors; group 4, 2 medial double-loaded screw anchors tied in 2 mattress stitches and 2 push-in lateral anchors capturing the medial sutures in a crisscross tied in 2 mattress stitches and 2 push-in lateral anchors creating a suture-bridge for 3,500 cycles or until failure. Endpoints were cyclic loading displacement (5 and 10 mm), total displacement, and ultimate failure load. RESULTS: A single row of triply loaded anchors was more resistant to stretching to a 5- and 10-mm gap than the double-row repairs with or without the addition of a rip-stop suture (P < .05). The addition of a rip-stop stitch made the repair more resistant to gap formation than a double row repair (P < .05). The crisscross double row created by 2 medial double-loaded suture anchors and 2 lateral push-in anchors stretched more than any other group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Double-row repairs with either crossing sutures or 4 separate anchor points were more likely to fail (5- or 10-mm gap) than a single-row repair loaded with 3 simple sutures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The triple-loaded anchors with ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene-containing sutures placed in a single row were more resistant to stretching than the double-row groups.
机译:目的:评估力量和安全的各种suture-tendon接口缝合锚三重和双装载分子的重量polyethylene-containing缝合线和评估将这些的相对有效性锚单列或双列布置通过循环荷载,然后破坏性测试。方法:冈下肌重新连接原肱骨使用1的足迹在40牛5个不同修复模式的肩膀。双排修复测试。缝合线都是用于维修。进行了研究:组1、2 triple-loaded螺丝缝合锚与简单的一行针;在一个单一的行与简单的缝合第四缝合传递垂直地(格子布”等“针);主持人用一个垂直的床垫缝合从内侧锚和2简单针从外侧锚;4,2内侧轻型螺旋锚系在2床垫针和2推入的横向定位捕捉内侧缝合线交错联系在一起在2床垫针,2推入的外侧锚创建suture-bridge 3500周期或者直到失败。位移(5和10毫米),总位移,和最终的破坏载荷。三重加载锚抗拉伸和5 - 10毫米差距比双排修复有或没有添加格子布缝合(P < . 05)等的。rip-stop缝合修复抗差距的形成比双排修复(P < . 05)。创建的交错双排2内侧轻型缝合锚和2侧嵌入的锚拉伸比任何其他组(P < . 05)。交叉缝合或4不同的锚点更有可能失败(5 - 10毫米的差距)比单列修理装满3简单缝合。锚与相对分子质量polyethylene-containing缝合线放置在一个单行拉伸比有抵抗力“双组。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号