首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Internal Medicine >Using the appropriate fishing net for computed tomographic coronary angiography in daily clinical practice.
【24h】

Using the appropriate fishing net for computed tomographic coronary angiography in daily clinical practice.

机译:使用适当的渔网来计算层析成象的冠状动脉造影在日常临床实践。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We read with interest the Invited Commentary by Diamond and Kaul. The authors correctly noted the variability in accuracy of computed tomographic coronary angiography.(CTCA) across the different centers.The Invited Commentary attributes substantial distortions in the operating characteristics to diagnostic verification bias. Although we agree that this bias is true for other studies where invasive coronary angiography (ICA) referrals are influenced by CTCA results, this was not an issue in our study. In the Ontario Multidetector Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography Study (OMCAS), all screened and enrolled patients underwent ICA irrespective of CTCA results.2 The results of CTCA were blinded to patients and treating physicians, and therefore we purposely avoided the possibility of verification bias. There is no need to correct for verification bias.
机译:我们邀请有兴趣阅读评论钻石和科尔。变化计算层析精度冠状动脉造影(CTCA)之间的不同中心。大量的扭曲操作特征诊断验证偏见。尽管我们同意这种偏见是正确的其他研究浸润性冠状动脉造影(ICA)推荐CTCA的影响结果,这不是一个问题在我们的研究中。安大略省经由电脑断层冠状动脉造影研究(OMCAS),所有的筛选和登记的病人接受了ICA无关的CTCA results.2失明患者和治疗医生,因此,我们故意避免的可能性验证偏见。为验证偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号