...
【24h】

Editorial Commentary: Are Larger Screws the Answer When Anatomic Reconstruction of an Acromioclavicular Separation Fails?

机译:编辑注:更大螺丝的答案当解剖重建的肩锁的分离失败?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although fixation methods have improved, failure after fixation of an acromioclavicular joint separation is not uncommon. This biomechanical study shows that in the setting of graft slippage through previously well-placed clavicular tunnels, a revision anatomic reconstruction is feasible with larger tenodesis screws. Although the risk of clavicular fracture increases with larger tunnels, anatomic revision with larger screws is an option in select cases.
机译:尽管固定方法有所改善,失败在固定的肩锁的关节分离并不少见。研究表明,在贪污滑移的设置通过之前良好的锁骨隧道、修订解剖重建可行的大腱固定术螺丝。锁骨骨折的风险增加较大的隧道,解剖修订更大在选择情况下螺丝是一种选择。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号