...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart >Predominance of normal left ventricular geometry in the male 'athlete's heart'
【24h】

Predominance of normal left ventricular geometry in the male 'athlete's heart'

机译:正常左心室几何的优势在男性运动员心脏的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims: This study evaluated (a) global LV adaption to endurance versus resistance training in male athletes, (b) LV assessment using by modern imaging technologies and (c) the impact of scaling for body size on LV structural data. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional design assessed the LV in 18 elite endurance-trained (ET), 19 elite resistance-trained (RT) and 17 sedentary control (CT) participants. Standard 2D, tissue Doppler and speckle tracking echocardiography assessed LV structure and function. Indexing of LV structures to body surface area (BSA) was undertaken using ratio and allometric scaling. Results: Absolute and scaled LV end-diastolic volume (ET: 43.7±6.8; RT: 34.2±7.4; CT 32.5±8.9 mL/m1.5; p0.05) and LV mass (ET: 29.8±6.6; RT: 25.4±8.7; CT 25.9±6.4 g/m2.7; p 0.05) were signi ficantly higher in ET compared with RT and CT. LV wall thickness were not different between ET and RT. 65% of ET and 95% of RT had normal geometry. Stroke volume was higher in ET compared with both RT and CT (p0.05). Whilst regional tissue velocity data were not different between groups, longitudinal and basal circumferential strain (aε) was reduced in RT compared with ET. Conclusions: In this comprehensive evaluation of the male athlete's heart (AH), normal LV geometry was predominant in both athlete groups. In the ET, 30% demonstrated an eccentric hypertrophy with no concentric hypertrophy in RT. Cardiac ? data in RT require further evaluation, and any interpretation of LV size should appropriately index for differences in body size.
机译:目的:本研究评估全球LV适应(a)在男性耐力和阻力训练运动员,(b)使用现代LV评估成像技术和(c)的影响扩展对LV体型结构的数据。方法:前瞻性横断面设计评估了在18精英endurance-trained LV(ET), 19个精英resistance-trained (RT)和17久坐不动的控制(CT)的参与者。组织多普勒和散斑跟踪超声心动图LV结构和评估函数。表面积(BSA)进行使用和比例异速生长的伸缩。LV舒张末期容积(等:43.7±6.8;34.2±7.4;质量(等:29.8±6.6;g / m2.7;在等相比,RT和CT。没有差异和rt, 65%的等和95%的RT正常几何。RT和CT相比是更高等术中,0.05)。组没有差异,纵和基底圆周应变(ε)降低在RT与等。结论:男运动员的综合评价心(啊),正常LV几何是主要的这两个运动员组。一个古怪的肥大没有同心在rt,心脏肥大吗?进一步评估,LV的任何解释应该适当的指数差异大小在身体的大小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号