首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >To Improve Pain and Function, Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections May Be an Alternative to Surgery for Treating Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review
【24h】

To Improve Pain and Function, Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections May Be an Alternative to Surgery for Treating Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review

机译:改善疼痛和功能,富含血小板血浆注射可能替代手术治疗肱骨外上髁炎:一个系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North AmericaPurpose: To determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection for lateral epicondylitis offers patients comparable outcomes to lateral epicondylar surgery. Methods: Embase, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were searched using the terms lateral epicondylitis, lateral elbow pain, tennis elbow, lateral epicondylalgia, and elbow tendinopathy individually and combined with the terms platelet-rich plasma injections and lateral epicondylar surgery. We compared pain relief, function between the 2 treatment options, and identified whether PRP injection reduced the incidence of lateral epicondylar surgery. Studies must have compared PRP injections with lateral epicondylar surgery for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis; be of Level I, II, or III evidence; and be written in the English language. Results: Three studies (1 Level II and 2 Level III) met inclusion criteria. Two of the studies suggested that PRP injections offer similar relief as surgery in the short and mid-term, one study reported that PRP injections and surgery had similar outcomes in pain improvement and return to work, whereas 1 study reported that surgery may be a better long-term solution. Conclusions: In comparison with lateral epicondylar surgery, PRP injections offer similar improvements in pain and function for patients suffering from lateral epicondylitis, especially in the short- and mid-term in 2 of the 3 included investigations. Therefore, PRP injections are an appropriate alternative for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Level of Evidence: Level III, Systematic Review of Level III or greater evidence.
机译:? AmericaPurpose:确定富含血小板血浆(PRP)对侧注入上髁炎患者提供了类似的结果外侧上髁的手术。Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE数据库搜索使用肱骨外上髁炎,外侧肘部疼痛、网球肘、侧epicondylalgia腱子病变衰退和肘部个人和结合条件富含血小板血浆注射和侧面上髁的手术。函数之间的2治疗方案确定是否PRP注入降低了发病率的外侧上髁的手术。必须比PRP和侧注射吗治疗外侧上髁的手术上髁炎;证据;结果:三个研究二(1级和2级3)符合入选标准。建议注射PRP提供类似救援手术在短期和中期研究报道,PRP注射和手术在痛苦中也有类似的结果改进和重返工作岗位,而1研究报告称手术可能是一个更好的长期解决方案。结论:与横向比较上髁的手术,PRP注射提供类似改善对病人的疼痛和功能肱骨外上髁炎,尤其是在短期和中期2的3调查。适当的替代治疗肱骨外上髁炎。三世,三世或更高水平的系统评价证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号