...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Differences in bee community composition between restored and remnant prairies are more strongly linked to forb community differences than landscape differences
【24h】

Differences in bee community composition between restored and remnant prairies are more strongly linked to forb community differences than landscape differences

机译:蜜蜂群落组成之间的差异恢复和残余草原更强烈与forb社区差异比景观的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Grassland restoration is an important tool for conserving bee biodiversity within agricultural landscapes. Restorations foster increases in local bee abundance and α‐diversity; however, these measures are insufficient for understanding whether remnant communities are being conserved. We compared native bee α‐diversity, β‐diversity and community composition between restored and remnant prairies in Minnesota, USA. We then investigated two potential drivers of bee community dissimilarity between restored and remnant prairies: proportion of agricultural land surrounding a restoration and differences in floral community between restored and remnant prairies. We selected 10 restored prairies that lie along a gradient of increasing agricultural land cover, ranging from 20% to 85% of surrounding land in agricultural production. We paired each restoration with a nearby prairie remnant and sampled bee and floral communities concurrently in each restoration–remnant pair. We quantified bee and forb α‐diversity, community composition, β‐diversity and levels of dissimilarity between restoration–remnant pairs along the gradient of agricultural development. Additionally, we quantified differences in the community‐weighted mean between restored and remnant prairies for two bee traits, oligolecty and tongue length, to investigate how differences in floral community between restored and remnant prairies may influence bee community composition. While bee α‐diversity between restored and remnant prairies was similar, bee composition between restorations and remnants was significantly different with restorations being more homogeneous than remnants. Differences in bee community composition and β‐diversity were not significantly related to agricultural landscapes or floral community dissimilarity; however, we found a significantly higher proportion of oligolectic bees in remnant prairies. This difference in oligolectic bees was likely related to the absence of important host plants in restorations. Synthesis and application. Prairie restorations should seek to provide diverse floral resources that are of similar composition to remnant prairies. Specifically, providing important floral host plants for pollen specialist bees could improve restorations' ability to conserve prairie remnant bee communities.
机译:抽象的草原恢复是一个重要的中蜂生物多样性保护的工具农业景观。增加本地蜜蜂和α多样性丰富;然而,这些措施还不够残余的社区是否理解是守恒的。α多样性,应承担的β多样性和社区恢复和残余草原之间的成分在明尼苏达州,美国。蜜蜂社区不同的潜在的司机恢复与残余草原:比例农业用地周边的恢复和植物群落差异恢复和残余草原。躺在一个梯度的恢复草原提高农业土地覆盖,从20%到85%的周围的土地在农业生产。附近的草原遗迹和采样蜜蜂和花同时在每一个社区restoration-remnant一对。forbα多样性,应承担的社会成分,β多样性和水平之间的不同restoration-remnant成对的梯度农业发展。量化不同社区的加权意味着恢复和残余草原之间两只蜜蜂特征,oligolecty和舌头长度研究植物群落的差异恢复和遗迹之间的大草原影响蜜蜂社区组成。α多样性恢复和残余草原之间修复之间是相似的,蜜蜂组成和残余明显不同修复被更均匀的残骸。地理成分和β多样性显著相关的农业景观或植物群落不同;发现了一个显著的比例更高在遗迹草原oligolectic蜜蜂。不同oligolectic蜜蜂可能是相关的没有重要的寄主植物修复。修复应该寻求提供多样化花卉资源相似的成分残余草原。重要的植物寄主植物花粉专家蜜蜂能提高修复的保护草原遗迹蜜蜂的能力社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号