...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied mathematics and computation >Comparative study between four classical spectral analysis methods
【24h】

Comparative study between four classical spectral analysis methods

机译:四种经典光谱分析方法之间的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This work presents a comparison between four classical spectral analyses: Fourier, multitaper, maximum entropy and iterative regression. Six 256-sample artificial series were generated by superposition of sine functions, long trends (of time scale greater than series length) and noise (generated by pseudo-random function). A spectral analysis of an observational time series (sunspot number) was also performed. Advantages and drawbacks of every method are described in this work. (c) 2004 Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:这项工作提出了四种经典的光谱分析之间的比较:傅立叶,多锥度,最大熵和迭代回归。通过叠加正弦函数,长趋势(时间尺度大于序列长度)和噪声(通过伪随机函数生成),生成了六个256个样本的人工序列。还对观测时间序列(黑子数)进行了光谱分析。这项工作描述了每种方法的优缺点。 (c)2004年由Elsevier Inc.发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号