首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association >Retrospective Study Comparing Two Materials Commonly Used in the LFS Technique for CCLR
【24h】

Retrospective Study Comparing Two Materials Commonly Used in the LFS Technique for CCLR

机译:回顾性研究比较两种材料常用的LFS CCLR技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) is the most common cause of degenerative joint disease (DJD) in the stifle of adult dogs. Over the last several years, a new generation of nonabsorbable, multifilament, polyblend polyethylene orthopedic suturematerials have been evaluated for use in the lateral fabellar suture (LFS) technique for surgical treatment of CCLR. This retrospective study compared the short-term outcome of 16 dogs that were treated using the LFS technique using either a proprietarypolyblend polyethylene orthopedic suture material (FW) or monofilament nylon leader line (NLL). The FW was significantly more likely to fail compared with the NLL (P = 0.0379). Specifically, the FW was 14.667 times likelier to fail than the NLL. When oneand two strands of NLL were compared with FW, the FW was 6 times more likely to fail than one strand of NLL and 32 times more likely to fail than two strands of NLL. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study comparing the two materials used in the LFS procedure performed in clinical cases.
机译:颅十字韧带破裂(CCLR)退化性关节疾病的最常见原因(DJD)扼杀的成年狗。几年来,新一代的时,复丝,聚合物共混体聚乙烯整形suturematerials用于评估外侧fabellar缝合(LFS)技术CCLR的外科治疗。研究比较了16只狗的短期结果治疗使用LFS技术使用要么proprietarypolyblend聚乙烯整形缝合材料(FW)或单丝尼龙线(NLL)领袖。更容易失败而三八线以南(P =0.0379)。可能比三八线以南。股划分与弗兰克-威廉姆斯相比,弗兰克-威廉姆斯6次,失败的可能性也许比一个链划分以及32倍更有可能比两个失败线附近。是第一个研究比较两种材料吗LFS过程表现在临床使用用例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号