...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Heat exchanger network optimization with discontinuous exchanger cost function
【24h】

Heat exchanger network optimization with discontinuous exchanger cost function

机译:具有不连续换热器成本函数的换热器网络优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Heat exchanger network synthesis with a stagewise superstructure gives rise to a mixed integer nonlinear problem. This problem is further complicated if discontinuous cost functions are considered. Three different formulations namely Big-M (BM), Convex-Hull (CH) and Multi-M (MM) are used to formulate the discontinuous cost functions. The BM formulation is believed to be the simplest but least efficient among the three methods. The CH formulation, on the other hand, performs better than the BM method by disaggregating the exchanger area into sub-areas. Due to the disaggregation of the exchanger area, the CH formulation requires more continuous variables but produces a tighter relaxation than the BM method. Instead of disaggregating the exchanger area, the MM formulation disaggregates the BM parameter for each pair of cost segments produces the same relaxation as the CH formulation for problems. Since the MM formulation does not need to disaggregate exchanger areas, it requires less continuous variables than the CH formulation. In this paper, performances in terms of problem relaxation, objective values and computing times of the three formulations are compared.
机译:具有分阶段上层结构的换热器网络综合引起混合整数非线性问题。如果考虑不连续的成本函数,这个问题将变得更加复杂。三种不同的公式,即Big-M(BM),凸包(CH)和Multi-M(MM)用于公式化不连续成本函数。在这三种方法中,BM配方被认为是最简单但效率最低的。另一方面,通过将交换器区域分解为子区域,CH配方的性能优于BM方法。由于交换剂区域的分解,CH配方需要更多连续变量,但比BM方法产生更紧密的松弛。 MM公式不是分解交换器区域,而是分解每对成本段的BM参数,从而产生与CH公式相同的松弛问题。由于MM公式不需要分解交换器区域,因此与CH公式相比,它需要较少的连续变量。在本文中,比较了三种公式在问题缓解,目标值和计算时间方面的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号