...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ergonomics >Are pressure measurements effective in the assessment of office chair comfort/discomfort? A review
【24h】

Are pressure measurements effective in the assessment of office chair comfort/discomfort? A review

机译:压力测量对评估办公椅的舒适性/不适感是否有效?回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Nowadays, the majority of jobs in the western world involves sitting in an office chair. As a result, a comfortable and supported sitting position is essential for employees. In the literature, various objective methods (e.g. pressure measurements, measurements of posture, EMG etc.) have been used to assess sitting comfort/discomfort, but their validity remains unknown. This review therefore examines the relationship between subjective comfort/discomfort and pressure measurements while sitting in office chairs. The literature search resulted in eight papers that met all our requirements. Four studies identified a relationship between subjective comfort/discomfort and pressure distribution parameters (including correlations of up to r = 0.7 +/- 0.13). However, the technique for evaluating subjective comfort/discomfort seems to play an important role on the results achieved, therefore placing their validity into question. The peak pressure on the seat pan, the pressure distribution on the backrest and the pressure pattern changes (seat pan and backrest) all appear to be reliable measures for quantifying comfort or discomfort. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
机译:如今,西方世界的大多数工作都是坐在办公椅上。因此,舒适和支撑的坐姿对员工至关重要。在文献中,已经使用各种客观方法(例如压力测量,姿势测量,EMG等)来评估就座舒适性/不适感,但是其有效性仍然未知。因此,本次审查探讨了坐在办公椅上时主观舒适度/不适度与压力测量之间的关系。文献检索得出了八篇符合我们所有要求的论文。四项研究确定了主观舒适感/不适感与压力分布参数之间的关系(包括相关性,最高r = 0.7 +/- 0.13)。然而,评估主观舒适度/不适感的技术似乎对所获得的结果起着重要作用,因此质疑其有效性。座垫上的峰值压力,靠背上的压力分布和压力模式变化(座垫和靠背)似乎都是量化舒适度或不舒适度的可靠措施。 (c)2015 Elsevier Ltd和人体工程学学会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号