首页> 外文期刊>Applied immunohistochemistry and molecular morphology: AIMM >Cytokeratin 7/20 and MUC1, 2, 5AC, and 6 expression patterns in Barrett's esophagus and intestinal metaplasia of the stomach: intestinal metaplasia of the cardia is related to Barrett's esophagus.
【24h】

Cytokeratin 7/20 and MUC1, 2, 5AC, and 6 expression patterns in Barrett's esophagus and intestinal metaplasia of the stomach: intestinal metaplasia of the cardia is related to Barrett's esophagus.

机译:巴雷特食管和胃肠上皮化生中的细胞角蛋白7/20和MUC1、2、5AC和6的表达方式:test门肠化生与巴雷特上皮的食管有关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Intestinal metaplasia (IM) in endoscopic biopsies obtained from close to the gastroesophageal junction may represent IM of the cardia (CIM) or Barrett's esophagus (BE), which have different malignant potentials despite similar morphology. This study compared cytokeratin (CK) 7/20 and mucin (MUC1, 2, 5AC, and 6) immunopatterns in biopsies from BE (n = 41), CIM (n = 35), and antral gastric IM (AIM, n = 37) to evaluate their roles as diagnostic aids. CK7 and CK20 expression was described as absent, patchy (superficial and deep), continuous superficial only, continuous deep only, and diffuse. Eleven different combinations of CK7/20 expression were seen. Since CK20 staining was positive in all cases, four main patterns were defined on the basis of the observed CK7 staining as 1, absent; 2, patchy (superficial and/or deep); 3, diffuse; and 4, continuous superficial only. Overall CK7 positivity (regardless of pattern) was higher in BE and CIM than in AIM. CK patterns 3 and 4 were also higher in BE and CIM than in AIM. For either pattern 3 or 4, the positive and negative predictive values for BE versus AIM were 95% and 67%, respectively. MUC1 was rarely expressed in BE and CIM compared with AIM, whereas the opposite was noted for MUC5AC expression. MUC2 and MUC6 expression was similar in all locations. In conclusion, diffuse or continuous superficial CK7 staining is highly characteristic of BE and CIM and contrasts with AIM. It is, however, not very sensitive. CK20 profiles have no added value. Mucin expression also differs between BE and CIM versus AIM, but the specificity of any pattern is insufficient for distinction in individual cases. Importantly, CK and MUC expression patterns in BE and CIM are virtually indistinguishable, limiting their use in this differential and raising the question of whether they are biologically related.
机译:从靠近胃食管交界处获得的内窥镜活检中的肠上皮化生(IM)可能代表IM门癌(CIM)或巴雷特食管(BE),尽管形态相似,但它们具有不同的恶性潜能。这项研究比较了BE(n = 41),CIM(n = 35)和胃窦IM(AIM,n = 37)活检中的细胞角蛋白(CK)7/20和粘蛋白(MUC1、2、5AC和6)免疫模式)以评估其作为诊断辅助工具的作用。 CK7和CK20的表达被描述为不存在,不完整(表面和深层),仅连续浅层,仅连续深层和弥散。观察到十一种不同的CK7 / 20表达组合。由于在所有情况下CK20染色均为阳性,因此根据观察到的CK7染色定义了四个主要模式,即1个,不存在; 4个主要模式被定义为1。 2,斑片状(表面和/或深处); 3,扩散;和4,仅连续表面。 BE和CIM的总体CK7阳性率(不考虑模式)高于AIM。 BE和CIM中的CK模式3和4也高于AIM。对于模式3或4,BE对AIM的正预测值和负预测值分别为95%和67%。与AIM相比,MUC1在BE和CIM中很少表达,而MUC5AC的表达则相反。在所有位置,MUC2和MUC6的表达均相似。总之,CK7弥漫性或连续性浅表染色是BE和CIM的高度特征,并且与AIM形成对比。但是,它不是很敏感。 CK20配置文件没有附加值。 BE和CIM与AIM之间的粘蛋白表达也不同,但是任何模式的特异性不足以在个别情况下进行区分。重要的是,BE和CIM中的CK和MUC表达模式实际上是无法区分的,限制了它们在这种差异中的使用,并提出了它们是否生物学相关的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号