...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ergonomics >The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers
【24h】

The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers

机译:集装箱尺寸,频率和水平延伸范围对女性工业工人最大可接受举升重量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the development of our present manual materials handling (MMH) guidelines (Snook, S.H., Ciriello, V.M., 1991, The design of manual tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces, Ergonomics 34, 1197-1213), the assumption was made that the effects of frequency on maximum acceptable weights (MAWs) of lifting with a large box (hand distance, 38cm from chest) were similar to that of lifting with a small box (hand distance, 17cm from chest). The first purpose of the present experiment was to investigate this assumption with female industrial workers. The second purpose was to study the effects of extended horizontal reach lifting (hand distance, 44.6cm from chest) on MAWs as a confirmation of the results of a previous studies on this variable with males (Ciriello, V.M., Snook, S.H., Hughes, G.J., 1993. Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces. Hum. Factors 35(1), 175-186; Ciriello, V.M., 2003. The effects of box size, frequency, and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting. Int. J. Ind. Ergon, 32, 115-120). Lastly, we studied the effects of high frequency (20 lifts/min) on MAWs of lifting. Ten female industrial workers performed 15 variations of lifting using our psychophysical methodology whereby the subjects were asked to select a workload they could sustain for 8h without "straining themselves or without becoming unusually tired weakened, overheated or out of breath". The results confirmed that MAWs of lifting with the large box was significantly effected by frequency. The frequency factor pattern in this study was similar to the frequency pattern from a previous study using the small box (Ciriello, V.M., Snook, S.H., 1983. A study of size distance height, and frequency effects on manual handling tasks. Hum. Factors 25(5), 473-483) for all fast frequencies down to one lift every 2min with deviations of 7%, 15%, and 13% for the one lift every 5 and 30min tasks and the one lift in 8h task, respectively, The effects of lifting with an extended horizontal reach decreased MAW 22% and 18% for the mid and center lift and the effects of the 20 lifts/min frequency resulted in a MAW that was 47% of a 1 lift/min MAW. Incorporating these results in future guidelines should improve the design of MMH tasks for female workers.
机译:在制定我们当前的手动物料搬运(MMH)指南(Snook,SH,Ciriello,VM,1991,手动任务设计:最大可接受重量和力的修订表,人体工程学34、1197-1213)时,假设是结果表明,频率对大箱子(手距胸部38厘米)提起最大可接受重量(MAW)的影响与小箱子(手距胸部17厘米)提重的影响相似。本实验的第一个目的是与女性工业工人一起调查这一假设。第二个目的是研究水平伸手抬高(手距离,距胸部44.6cm)对MAW的影响,以证实先前对男性(Ciriello,VM,Snook,SH,Hughes, GJ,1993.对心理的进一步研究确定了最大可接受的重量和力量。Hum。Factors 35(1),175-186; Ciriello,VM,2003.盒子尺寸,频率和水平延伸范围对最大可接受重量的影响Int。J. Ind。Ergon,32,115-120)。最后,我们研究了高频(20升/分钟)对MAW的影响。十名女性工业工人使用我们的心理物理学方法进行了15种举重动作,要求受试者选择可以承受8小时的工作量,而又不会“劳累自己或不会变得异常疲倦,虚弱,过热或无法呼吸”。结果证实,大箱子举起的MAW受到频率的显着影响。这项研究中的频率因子模式类似于先前使用小盒子进行的研究中的频率模式(Ciriello,VM,Snook,SH,1983年。对距离距离高度的研究,以及频率对手动处理任务的影响。 25(5),473-483),对于每2分钟下降一次提升的所有快速频率,每5分钟和30分钟任务一次提升一次以及在8小时任务中一次提升一次,偏差分别为7%,15%和13%,对于中部和中央举升而言,水平延伸范围较大时举升的效果降低了22%和18%,每分钟20举升频率的效果导致MAW降低了1升/分钟MAW的47%。将这些结果纳入将来的指南中应该会改进针对女工的MMH任务的设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号