...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ergonomics >Ergonomic evaluation of masons laying concrete masonry units and autoclaved aerated concrete
【24h】

Ergonomic evaluation of masons laying concrete masonry units and autoclaved aerated concrete

机译:砌筑混凝土砌体和加气加气混凝土的泥工的工效学评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Masons working with concrete masonry unit block have high rates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders to the low back and shoulders associated with repetitively lifting and buttering heavy block. A new material, autoclaved aerated concrete, may reduce the risk of shoulder and back injury but, ergonomic evaluation is needed. This study evaluated shoulder exposure parameters, low back stress, and worker perceptions in two groups of journey level masons, one using CMU and the other using AAC block. Results indicate that for the left arm AAC masons spent significantly more time than CMU masons in static (38.2% versus 31.1%, respectively), and less time in slow motions (48.2% versus 52.2%, respectively) and faster motions (13.6% versus 16.7%, respectively) (p<0.05). CMU masons had significantly greater shoulder and low back pain (p = 0.009) and they held block significantly longer than AAC masons (p < 0.001). Low back compressive forces were high for both materials. Masons handling AAC demonstrated less left upper extremity stress but both materials were estimated to be hazardous to the low back.
机译:与混凝土砌体单元砌块一起工作的泥瓦匠,由于反复举起和涂黄油而导致腰背和肩部与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病发生率很高。一种新材料,高压灭菌加气混凝土,可以减少肩背受伤的风险,但需要进行人体工程学评估。这项研究评估了两组旅途水平泥瓦匠的肩部暴露参数,下背压力和工人知觉,一组使用CMU,另一组使用AAC块。结果表明,对于左臂,AAC泥工在静态下花费的时间明显多于CMU泥室(分别为38.2%和31.1%),在慢动作(分别为48.2%和52.2%)和更快的动作(分别为13.6%和13.6%)上花费的时间更少。分别为16.7%)(p <0.05)。 CMU泥瓦匠的肩膀和下背部疼痛明显更大(p = 0.009),并且与AAC泥瓦匠相比,他们的阻滞时间明显更长(p <0.001)。两种材料的后背压缩力均较高。处理AAC的泥瓦匠的左上肢压力较小,但估计这两种材料都对腰背有害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号