Holding: Lower court didn't err when it found that a plaintiff failed to support allegation that securities firm was using software in which he claimed copyright interest. Takeaway: The allegations were so thin that the plaintiff was not even entitled to "burden" the defendant with discovery, even for the limited purpose of determining what software the securities firm was actually using. A plaintiff alleging copyright infringement failed to adequately allege that a securities firm was using the software in which the plaintiff claimed copyright interest, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled Oct. 23 in a decision designated as non-precedential (Levey v. Brownstone Inv. Grp., LLC, 2014 BL 299450, 3d Cir., No. 13-3251, 10/23/14).
展开▼
机译：持有:下级法院没有犯错的时候发现原告未能支持指控证券公司在他使用软件声称版权利益。太薄,原告指控即使被告有权“负担”发现,即使是有限的的目的确定什么是软件证券公司实际使用。侵权未能充分声称证券公司用的软件原告声称版权利益,美国第三巡回上诉法院判决10月23日指定为在决定non-precedential (Grp利维诉上流社会的发票。有限责任公司,2014提单299450、3 d Cir。13 - 3251。10/23/14).
展开▼
