首页> 外文期刊>Applied cognitive psychology >Improving the Enhanced Cognitive Interview With a New Interview Strategy: Category Clustering Recall
【24h】

Improving the Enhanced Cognitive Interview With a New Interview Strategy: Category Clustering Recall

机译:通过新的面试策略改善增强型认知面试:类别聚类召回

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Increasing recall is crucial for investigative interviews. The enhanced cognitive interview (ECI) has been widely used for this purpose and found to be generally effective. We focused on further increasing recall with a new interview strategy, category clustering recall (CCR). Participants watched a mock robbery video and were interviewed 48 hours later with either the (i) ECI; (ii) revised enhanced cognitive interview 1 (RECI1) - with CCR instead of the change order mnemonic during the second recall; or (iii) revised enhanced cognitive interview 2 (RECI2) - also with CCR but conjunctly used with 'eye closure' and additional open-ended follow up questions. Participants interviewed with CCR (RECI1 and RECI2) produced more information without compromising accuracy; thus, CCR was effective. Eye closure and additional open-ended follow up questions did not further influence recall when using CCR. Major implications for real-life investigations are discussed. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:召回率的提高对于调查性访谈至关重要。增强型认知面试(ECI)已被广泛用于此目的,并被普遍认为是有效的。我们专注于通过新的面试策略“类别聚类召回(CCR)”来进一步提高召回率。参与者观看了抢劫模拟录像,并在48小时后接受了(i)ECI的采访; (ii)修订后的增强型认知访谈1(RECI1)-在第二次召回期间使用CCR代替变更单记忆。或(iii)修订后的增强认知访谈2(RECI2)-也适用于CCR,但与“闭眼”和其他开放式随访问题结合使用。接受CCR采访的参与者(RECI1和RECI2)在不影响准确性的前提下提供了更多信息。因此,CCR是有效的。使用CCR时,闭眼和其他开放式随访问题不会进一步影响召回率。讨论了对现实生活调查的主要意义。版权所有(C)2016 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号