首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavioral and experimental economics >How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies
【24h】

How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies

机译:如何有效推动吗?影响大小和经验推动的极限研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Changes in the choice architecture, so-called nudges, have been employed in a variety of contexts to alter people's behavior. Although nudging has gained a widespread popularity, the effect sizes of its influences vary considerably across studies. In addition, nudges have proven to be ineffective or even backfire in selected studies which raises the question whether, and under which conditions, nudges are effective. Therefore, we conduct a quantitative review on nudging with 100 primary publications including 317 effect sizes from different research areas. We derive four key results. (1) A morphological box on nudging based on eight dimensions, (2) an assessment of the effectiveness of different nudging interventions, (3) a categorization of the relative importance of the application context and the nudge category, and (4) a comparison of nudging and digital nudging. Thereby, we shed light on the (in)effectiveness of nudging and we show how the findings of the past can be used for future research. Practitioners, especially government officials, can use the results to review and adjust their policy making.
机译:选择结构的变化,所谓推动,已经在各种各样的就业环境改变人的行为。推动了普遍欢迎,尺度效应的影响差异很大在研究。在选择是无效的,甚至会适得其反研究提出了质疑在这情况下,推动是有效的。因此,我们进行定量评估与100主要出版物,包括推动从不同的研究领域317年尺度效应。我们得出四个关键结果。框推动基于八个维度,(2)一个评估不同的有效性推动干预,(3)的分类应用程序的相对重要性上下文和推动类别,和(4)比较轻推和数字逼近。因此,我们阐明了有效性促使我们展示的结果过去的可以用于未来的研究。从业者,尤其是政府官员,可以使用结果审查和调整政策制定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号