...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Productivity of authors in the field of diabetes: bibliographic analysis of trial publications
【24h】

Productivity of authors in the field of diabetes: bibliographic analysis of trial publications

机译:作者在糖尿病领域的生产力:试验出版物的书目分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY QUESTION Are trial publications of glucose lowering drugs dominated by a small group of highly prolific authors? SUMMARY ANSWER One third of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence base on glucose lowering drug treatment for diabetes had contributions from 110 (<1% of all) authors. WHAT !S KNOWN AND WHATTHIS PAPER ADDS Honorary authorship is known to be common in research articles. This analysis shows that 110 authors contributed to one third, and the top 11 contributed to 10% of the evidence base of glucose lowering treatment, addingto concerns about the independence and integrity of this evidence base.
机译:研究问题是降低葡萄糖的试验出版物,由一小部分高产作者主导吗? 摘要答案是,糖尿病的葡萄糖降低药物治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)的三分之一的贡献,其作者的贡献(占所有)作者的贡献。 众所周知的是,众所周知的荣誉作者身份在研究文章中很普遍。 该分析表明,110名作者贡献了三分之一,前11名贡献了降低葡萄糖治疗的证据基础的10%,这增加了人们对该证据基础的独立性和完整性的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号