...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >CAESAREANS AND CHILD HEALTH - Misinformation about caesarean sections
【24h】

CAESAREANS AND CHILD HEALTH - Misinformation about caesarean sections

机译:剖腹产和儿童健康 - 关于剖腹产的错误信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The caesarean section rate remains an issue for polarised debate. If Blustein and Liu are right, women are choosing to give birth by a more risky route. However, this debate usually comes with a fair dose of misinformation and opinion. These authors do not disappoint. Firstly, women with a previous caesarean do not have to decide between a caesarean and a vaginal delivery but between a planned caesarean and a planned vaginal delivery. A planned vaginal delivery carries up to a 63% risk of emergency caesarean.2 This subtle but key difference is at the centre of antenatal misinformation.
机译:剖腹产率仍然是两极分化辩论的问题。 如果Blustein和Liu是正确的,那么妇女选择以更风险的途径分娩。 但是,这场辩论通常带有大量的错误信息和意见。 这些作者不会令人失望。 首先,先前剖腹产的妇女不必在剖腹产和阴道分娩之间做出决定,而是在计划中的剖腹产和计划的阴道分娩之间做出决定。 计划中的阴道分娩最多承受着紧急剖腹产的63%风险。2这种微妙但主要的区别是产前错误信息的中心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号