...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Do liberal blood transfusions cause more harm than good?
【24h】

Do liberal blood transfusions cause more harm than good?

机译:自由输血会造成的弊大于利吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Guidelines and evidence from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses increasingly support restrictive blood transfusion, but it is being implemented only slowly, explain Lawrence Tim Goodnough and Michael Murphy. They argue that electronic systems for clinical decision support could improve blood use. Blood transfusions have been identified as one of the most overused therapies both in the United States and the UK. In England the National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion programme has found inappropriate use over several years (table 1) and there have been various initiatives to improve use. Choosing Wisely, a US initiative that supports evidence based care to minimise the harms of overtreat-ment, has highlighted five recommendations for minimising blood use (box I).
机译:劳伦斯·蒂姆·古德诺(Lawrence Tim Goodnough)和迈克尔·墨菲(Michael Murphy)解释说,来自随机对照试验和荟萃分析的准则和证据越来越支持限制性输血,但它只是被缓慢地实施。 他们认为,用于临床决策支持的电子系统可以改善血液使用。 输血已被确定为美国和英国最受欢迎的疗法之一。 在英格兰,全国对输血计划的比较审计发现了几年来不当使用(表1),并且已经有各种计划来改善使用。 明智地选择了一项支持基于证据的倡议,以最大程度地减少过度治疗的危害,它强调了五个建议最大程度地减少血液使用的建议(Box I)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号