...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Clinical utility of traditional and new tests in the diagnosis of biceps tendon injuries and superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in the shoulder.
【24h】

Clinical utility of traditional and new tests in the diagnosis of biceps tendon injuries and superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in the shoulder.

机译:传统测试和新测试在二头肌腱损伤和肩上唇后上病变的诊断中的临床应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Clinical tests are a key element in diagnosing shoulder lesions. PURPOSE: This study examined the clinical utility of traditional and new examination tests, the upper cut for biceps injuries, and the modified dynamic labral shear for superior glenoid labral lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 325 consecutive patients who were seen for shoulder pain underwent a standardized clinical testing battery. Six clinical tests that have been previously reported in the literature (Yergason's, Speed's, bear hug, belly press, O'Brien's, and anterior slide) and 2 new examination tests (upper cut and modified dynamic labral shear) were performed. Clinical examination findings were correlated with findings in those who came to surgery (101 patients). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positiveegative predictive value, and positiveegative likelihood ratio were calculated for each test. A binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine which tests produced the most significant findings. RESULTS: For biceps disease, the bear hug and upper cut were most sensitive (0.79 and 0.73, respectively), whereas the belly press and Speed's test were most specific (0.85 and 0.81, respectively). The upper cut was most accurate (0.77) and produced the highest positive likelihood ratio (3.38). For labral injury, the modified dynamic labral shear demonstrated sensitivity of 0.72, specificity of 0.98, accuracy of 0.84, and a positive likelihood ratio of 31.57. A binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the combination of the upper cut and Speed's tests were significantly better at detecting biceps lesions (P = .021, R(2) = .400) than other tests, whereas labral lesions were best identified by combination of the modified dynamic labral shear and O'Brien's maneuvers (P = .045, R(2) = .641). CONCLUSION: The new tests are helpful additions to the clinical examination for shoulder injury. The modified dynamic labral shear test demonstrates high scores for clinical utility and exhibits a high likelihood ratio, indicating a significant probability of affecting the clinical decision, which should moderately or significantly improve the diagnostic conclusion and allow the clinician to be more efficient in making an accurate diagnosis.
机译:背景:临床测试是诊断肩部病变的关键因素。目的:本研究检查了传统检查和新检查方法的临床效用,肱二头肌损伤的上切和改良盂唇盂唇病变的改良动力唇切力。研究设计:队列研究(诊断);证据级别:2。方法:总共325例因肩部疼痛而连续出现的患者接受了标准化的临床测试。先前进行了文献报道的六项临床试验(Yergason氏,Speed氏,熊抱,腹部压迫,O'Brien氏和前滑道)和两项新的检查试验(上切和改良动态唇切变)进行了。临床检查的发现与参加手术的患者(101例)的发现相关。为每个测试计算灵敏度,特异性,准确性,阳性/阴性预测值和阳性/阴性似然比。使用二进制逻辑回归分析来确定哪些测试产生了最重要的发现。结果:对于二头肌疾病,熊拥抱和上割最敏感(分别为0.79和0.73),而腹部按压和Speed's测试最为特异性(分别为0.85和0.81)。上切最准确(0.77),并产生最高的正似然比(3.38)。对于阴唇损伤,改良的动态阴唇切变表现出0.72的敏感性,0.98的特异性,0.84的准确性以及31.57的正似然比。二进制logistic回归分析显示,上切和Speed测验的组合在检测二头肌病变方面显着优于其他测验(P = .021,R(2)= .400),而唇部病变最好通过结合使用来确定修改后的动态拉力剪和O'Brien的策略(P = .045,R(2)= .641)。结论:新测试对肩部损伤的临床检查有所帮助。改良的动态唇切力试验显示出较高的临床效用,并显示出较高的似然比,表明影响临床决策的可能性很高,这应适度或显着改善诊断结论,并使临床医生更有效地做出准确的决定。诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号