首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >A biomechanical comparison of initial fixation strength of 3 different methods of anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue graft tibial fixation: resistance to monotonic and cyclic loading.
【24h】

A biomechanical comparison of initial fixation strength of 3 different methods of anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue graft tibial fixation: resistance to monotonic and cyclic loading.

机译:三种不同的前交叉韧带软组织移植胫骨固定方法的初始固定强度的生物力学比较:对单调和循环载荷的抵抗力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Tibial fixation of soft tissue grafts continues to be problematic in the early postoperative period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: No differences exist for resistance to slippage of soft tissue grafts fixed with CentraLoc, Intrafix, or 35-mm bioabsorbable interference screws. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Bovine tibia and hoof extensor tendons were divided into 3 matched groups with 12 tibia and 12 extensor tendons in each group. Within each group, 6 specimens underwent monotonic loading to failure (1 mm/s), and 6 underwent cyclic loading (10,000 cycles, 125-325 N, 1 Hz). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted in mean load to failure or stiffness. The mean load to failure (and stiffness) for the 3 types of fixation were as follows: bioabsorbable interference screw, 631.6 +/- 130.1 N (88.17 +/- 6.79 N/mm); Intrafix, 644.3 +/- 195.2 N (81.65 +/- 16.5 N/mm); and CentraLoc, 791.1 +/- 72.7 N (77.89 +/- 7.07 N/mm). The slippage rates under cyclic loading for the 3 types of fixation were bioabsorbable interference screw, 0.336 +/- 0.074 microm/cycle; Intrafix, 27.2 +/- 31.6 microm/cycle; and CentraLoc, 0.0355 +/- 0.0046 microm/cycle. In this model, CentraLoc proved statistically superior in resistance to cyclic loading compared with the bioabsorbable interference screw (P < .05) and Intrafix (P < .0001). The bioabsorbable interference screw proved statistically superior to Intrafix in resistance to cyclic loading (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this bovine model, CentraLoc and bioabsorbable interference screws provided superior resistance to cyclic loading compared with Intrafix. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CentraLoc and bioabsorbable interference screws showed superior resistance to cyclic loading, which may indicate an increased resistance to clinical failure.
机译:背景:前交叉韧带重建术后早期,软组织移植物的胫骨固定仍然存在问题。假设:使用CentraLoc,Intrafix或35毫米可生物吸收干扰螺钉固定的软组织移植物的抗滑移性没有差异。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:将牛胫骨和蹄伸肌腱分为3组,每组12个胫骨和12个伸肌腱。在每组中,有6个样本经历了单调加载至破坏(1 mm / s),有6个遭受了循环加载(10,000个循环,125-325 N,1 Hz)。结果:平均破坏力或刚度没有统计学上的显着差异。这三种固定方式的平均破坏力(和刚度)如下:可生物吸收的干涉螺钉631.6 +/- 130.1 N(88.17 +/- 6.79 N / mm); Intrafix,644.3 +/- 195.2 N(81.65 +/- 16.5 N / mm);和CentraLoc,791.1 +/- 72.7 N(77.89 +/- 7.07 N / mm)。这三种固定方式在循环载荷下的滑动率是生物可吸收的干涉螺钉,0.336 +/- 0.074微米/循环; Intrafix,27.2 +/- 31.6微米/周期;和CentraLoc,0.0355 +/- 0.0046微米/周期。在该模型中,与生物可吸收的干涉螺钉(P <.05)和Intrafix(P <.0001)相比,CentraLoc在抗循环载荷方面具有统计学上的优越性。经证明,可生物吸收的干涉螺钉在抗循环载荷方面在统计学上优于Intrafix(P <.05)。结论:在这种牛模型中,与Intrafix相比,CentraLoc和可生物吸收的干涉螺钉对循环载荷具有出色的抵抗力。临床相关性:CentraLoc和可生物吸收的干涉螺钉对循环载荷表现出优异的抵抗力,这可能表明对临床失败的抵抗力增强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号