首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Can a double-row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?: A prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of double-row and single-row anchorage techniques with computed tomographic arthrography tendon healing
【24h】

Can a double-row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?: A prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of double-row and single-row anchorage techniques with computed tomographic arthrography tendon healing

机译:双排锚固技术能否改善关节镜式肩袖修复中的肌腱愈合?:前瞻性,非随机,双排和单排锚固技术与计算机断层扫描造影术中的腱修复的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Increasing the rate of watertight tendon healing has been suggested as an important criterion for optimizing clinical results in rotator cuff arthroscopic repair. HYPOTHESIS: A double-row anchorage technique for rotator cuff repair will produce better clinical results and a better rate of tendon healing than a single-row technique. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: We compared 31 patients undergoing surgery with a double-row anchorage technique using Panalok anchors and Cuff Tack anchors and 35 patients with rotator cuff tear undergoing surgery with a single-row anchorage arthroscopic technique using Panalok anchors. We compared pre- and postoperative Constant score and tendon healing, as evaluated by computed tomographic arthrography 6 months after surgery, in these 2 groups. RESULTS: The Constant score increased significantly in both groups, with no difference between the 2 groups (P = .4). Rotator cuff healing was judged anatomic in 19 patients with double-row anchorage and in 14 patients with single-row anchorage; this difference between the groups was significant (P = .03). CONCLUSION: In this first study comparing double- and single-row anchorage techniques, we found no significant difference in clinical results, but tendon healing rates were better with the double-row anchorage. Improvements in the double-row technique might lead to better clinical and tendon healing results.
机译:背景:提高水密性肌腱愈合率已被认为是优化肩袖关节镜修复临床效果的重要标准。假设:与单行技术相比,双行锚定修复肩袖的技术将产生更好的临床效果和更好的肌腱愈合率。研究设计:队列研究;证据等级:2。方法:我们比较了31例使用Panalok锚和Cuff Tack锚进行双排锚固术的手术患者和35例采用Panalok锚的单排锚固关节镜技术进行手术的肩袖撕裂患者。我们比较了两组患者术后6个月的术前和术后Constant评分和肌腱愈合情况,通过计算机断层摄影术进行评估。结果:两组的恒定评分均显着增加,两组之间无差异(P = .4)。在19例双排固定和14例单排固定中,判断肩袖愈合是解剖学的。两组之间的差异非常显着(P = .03)。结论:在第一项比较双行和单行锚固技术的研究中,我们发现临床结果无显着差异,但双行锚固的肌腱愈合率更好。双排技术的改进可能会导致更好的临床和肌腱愈合效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号