首页> 外文期刊>Apidologie >Assessment of pattern preferences by flower-naive bumblebees
【24h】

Assessment of pattern preferences by flower-naive bumblebees

机译:花天真大黄蜂对模式偏好的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two methods for the assessment of preferences by flower-naive bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) were compared. Bees with and without prior experience on rewarding patterns were given twenty choices of unrewarding patterns (radial vs. concentric) in a radial arm maze. Either way, a preference for radial patterns was obtained. Prior training on grids of circles, squares or diamonds amplified the preference, whereas training on a ring of circles did not. Prior rewarded experience does not merely draw the bees' attention to the patterns in the maze, or serve as a motivator, but also likely leads to a similarity judgment between training and testing. Given that it was possible to test for the choices of truly flower-naive bumblebees, training is at best unnecessary and is at worst a source of bias.
机译:比较了两种用于评估天真烂花蜜蜂(Bombus impatiens)偏好的方法。有和没有先验奖励模式的蜜蜂在radial臂迷宫中有20种不奖励模式的选择(径向与同心)。无论哪种方式,都获得了对径向图案的偏爱。事先在圆形,正方形或菱形网格上进行训练会增强偏好,而在圆形上进行训练则不会。先前获得的奖励经验不仅会吸引蜜蜂注意迷宫中的模式,或者会起到激励作用,而且还可能导致训练和测试之间存在相似性判断。考虑到可以测试真正的初花大黄蜂的选择,训练充其量是没有必要的,并且在最坏的情况下是一种偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号