...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and vaccine immunology: CVI >Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 syphilis system as a first-line method of reverse-sequence screening for syphilis diagnosis
【24h】

Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 syphilis system as a first-line method of reverse-sequence screening for syphilis diagnosis

机译:评估Bioplex 2200梅毒系统作为梅毒诊断的反向序列筛查的一线方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite recent technological advances, the diagnosis of syphilis remains a challenging enterprise. Actually, most high-volume laboratories have adopted the "reverse algorithm" due several factors, including the potential to automate testing. Recently, immunoassays processed on random-access systems have been proposed as screening tests. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performances of BioPlex 2200 Syphilis IgG and BioPlex 2200 Syphilis IgM, tests based on Multiplex Flow technology, in comparison with the performance of Architect Syphilis TP, a chemiluminescent immunoassay for the detection of IgG and/or IgM anti-Treponema pallidum antibodies. A retrospective study was performed with a panel of 100 blood donor sera, a panel of 350 clinical and laboratory-characterized syphilitic sera, and 170 samples obtained from subjects with potentially interfering conditions. Moreover, 200 unselected samples submitted to the Microbiology Laboratory of St. Orsola Hospital in Bologna for routine screening for syphilis were evaluated. As confirmatory tests, T. pallidum hemagglutination and Western blot assays were used. Considering the IgG Western blot (WB) assay to be the gold standard method, BioPlex 2200 Syphilis IgG specificity was far higher than Architect Syphilis TP specificity (89.7% versus 78.4%, respectively), whereas the sensitivity was 100% for both automated methods. Compared to the IgM WB assay, BioPlex 2200 Syphilis IgM performed with a specificity of 94.9%, whereas the sensitivity was 84.8%. Considering the excellent ease of use and automation, the high sample throughput and its valuable analytical performances, BioPlex Syphilis 2200 IgG could represent a suitable choice for high-volume laboratories. BioPlex Syphilis 2200 IgM could be considered a good addition to IgG testing for uncovering active infections.
机译:尽管最近的技术进步,但梅毒的诊断仍然是一个具有挑战性的企业。实际上,大多数大批量实验室都采用了“反向算法”,这是由于几个因素,包括自动测试的潜力。最近,已经提出了在随机访问系统上处理的免疫测定法作为筛选测试。这项研究的目的是评估Bioplex 2200梅毒IgG和Bioplex 2200梅毒IGM的诊断性能,基于多重流技术的测试,与建筑师TP的性能(一种化学物质免疫测定)的性能相比抗毛皮颗粒抗体。通过一组100个献血者血清,由350个临床和实验室特征的梅毒血清和170个样品从具有潜在干扰条件的受试者获得的170个样品进行了回顾性研究。此外,评估了200个未选择的样品,这些样本已提交给博洛尼亚圣奥尔索拉医院的微生物实验室,以评估梅毒的常规筛查。作为确认性测试,使用了肠结肠链球菌和蛋白质印迹分析。考虑到IgG Western印迹(WB)分析是黄金标准方法,Bioplex 2200梅毒IgG特异性远高于建筑师梅毒TP特异性(分别为89.7%和78.4%),而两种自动化方法的敏感性均为100%。与IgM WB分析相比,Bioplex 2200梅毒IgM的特异性为94.9%,而灵敏度为84.8%。考虑到出色的使用和自动化,高样本吞吐量及其有价值的分析性能,Bioplex梅毒2200 IgG可能代表了高量实验室的合适选择。 Bioplex梅毒2200 IgM可以被认为是用于发现活性感染的IgG测试的良好补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号