Federal appellate nominee Lawrence VanDyke received an unqualified rating from the American Bar Association, which cited interviews with legal peers who said he was accomplished, but “arrogant, lazy and an ideologue.” The sharply-worded assessment to the Senate Judiciary Committee surfaced ahead of the Trump nominee’s confirmation hearing Oct. 30 for a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. It ignited a simmering controversy that led ABA’s ratings group to defend its work amid allegations of bias.
展开▼
机译：联邦上诉提名人劳伦斯·范迪克（Lawrence Vandyke）获得了美国律师协会的不合格评级，美国律师协会（American Bar Association）援引了与法律同行的采访，他们说他已经完成了，但“傲慢，懒惰和意识形态。” 参议院司法委员会对参议院官方委员会的评估在10月30日在特朗普提名人的确认听证会之前浮出水面，以在美国第九巡回上诉法院的席位上席位。 它引发了一场激动人心的争议，该争议导致ABA的评级集团在指控偏见的情况下为其工作辩护。
展开▼
