...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of vascular surgery >Comparison of clinical outcome of stripping and CHIVA for treatment of varicose veins in the lower extremities.
【24h】

Comparison of clinical outcome of stripping and CHIVA for treatment of varicose veins in the lower extremities.

机译:剥离法和CHIVA法治疗下肢静脉曲张的临床疗效比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this nonrandomized case-review study was to compare the outcome of stripping and CHIVA for treatment of varicose veins in the lower extremities in our department. Outcome was evaluated by independent physicians. A total of 85 patients underwent saphenous vein stripping in association with phlebectomy and 90 patients underwent CHIVA cure. The duration of follow-up was 3 years. Study criteria were (1) presence of varicose veins as a cause of failure (1.1% in the CHIVA group vs. 15.3% in the stripping group), (2) appearance of telangiectasia (8.9% in the CHIVA group vs. 65.9% in the stripping group), (3) patient dissatisfaction rate (3.3% in the CHIVA group vs. 16.5% in the stripping group), (4) postoperative symptoms as a cause of failure (1.1% in the CHIVA group vs. 21.2% in the stripping group), and (5) saphenous nerve injury (1 patient in the CHIVA group vs. 16 in the stripping group). Differences between all five criteria were significantly in favor of the CHIVA group as compared to saphenous vein stripping with phlebectomy. Clinical results at 3 years are better for patients treated with CHIVA than stripping with regard to presence of varicose veins, clinical symptoms, presence of telangiectasia, cosmetic satisfaction, and neurologic complications. Data in our series of CHIVA treatments are comparable to those reported in the literature and better than those described in three series of stripping procedures with 3-year follow-up. A prospective randomized study is now underway to confirm these findings.
机译:这项非随机病例审查研究的目的是比较我科下肢静脉曲张剥脱术和CHIVA治疗的结果。结果由独立医师评估。共有85例患者接受了静脉摘除术并进行了大隐静脉摘除术,其中90例患者接受了CHIVA治愈。随访时间为3年。研究标准是(1)静脉曲张是导致失败的原因(CHIVA组为1.1%,剥离组为15.3%),(2)毛细血管扩张的出现(CHIVA组为8.9%,而剥离组为65.9% (3)患者不满意率(CHIVA组为3.3%,剥离组为16.5%),(4)术后症状是失败的原因(CHIVA组为1.1%,而26.4%为CHIVA组) (剥离组),以及(5)隐神经损伤(CHIVA组1例,剥离组16例)。与采用静脉切除术的大隐静脉剥离术相比,所有五个标准之间的差异均显着有利于CHIVA组。就静脉曲张的存在,临床症状,毛细血管扩张的存在,美容满意度和神经系统并发症而言,CHIVA治疗的患者3年的临床结果优于剥离。我们的CHIVA处理系列中的数据与文献报道的数据可比,并且比3个系列的三年剥脱过程中描述的数据更好。目前正在进行一项前瞻性随机研究,以证实这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号