首页> 外文期刊>Animal Feed Science and Technology >Nutrient composition, digestibility and energy value of distillers dried grains with solubles and condensed distillers solubles fed to growing pigs and evaluation of prediction methods
【24h】

Nutrient composition, digestibility and energy value of distillers dried grains with solubles and condensed distillers solubles fed to growing pigs and evaluation of prediction methods

机译:向生长中的猪饲喂含可溶物和浓缩的可蒸馏酒的干酒糟的营养成分,消化率和能量值及预测方法的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study had two objectives: (1) to determine the nutritional value of 13 batches of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) and 5 batches of condensed distillers solubles (CDS), and (2) to evaluate the prediction of the nutritional value of DDGS by using either mean values per DDGS type or lab measurements as potential predictors of nutrient content. The DDGS batches were derived from either wheat (n=3), corn (n=3) or a mixture of grains (n=7). The CDS batches were mainly wheat-based. The batches were collected from 11 European ethanol plants. Six barrows per dietary treatment were placed in individual metabolism cages and fed either a basic diet or a diet in which 30% of the basic diet was replaced by DOGS or CDS. Chromium oxide (4 g/kg) was included in the feed as an external marker. Fecal and ileal samples were collected and the apparent fecal digestibility (AFD) and apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of the diets were calculated using the indicator method. Consequently, AFD and AID values for DDGS and CDS were calculated through difference. Nutrient components, color measurements and in vitro protein values were evaluated as variables to predict the AFD, AID and net energy (NE) value of DOGS by means of multiple regression analysis. The DOGS corn samples had a higher gross energy and crude fat (CFAT) content (P0.001) and were more red (a*; P=0.002) and yellow (b*; P=0.003) than the DOGS wheat and DOGS mix samples. The NE value was also higher for DDGS corn (P0.001). Large variation existed between DOGS samples in amino acid digestibility (particularly of Lysine), even when DDGS was produced from the same type of grain. Hence, the use of mean values for each DOGS type did not result in a good estimation of the nutritional value. The NE value of DOGS could be predicted by the color parameter b* (R-2 = 71.1; P0.001) and CFAT (R-2=76.2; P0.001), or by combining CFAT and acid detergent fiber (R-2 = 94.0; P0.001). No good prediction equations could be established for the amino acid digestibility. The CDS samples also showed high variation in nutrient and amino acid composition and digestibility, which limits their usability in practical pig feed formulation. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究有两个目标:(1)确定13批含可溶物的酒糟(DDGS)和5批浓缩可溶物(CDS)的营养价值,以及(2)评价对谷物的营养价值的预测DDGS通过使用每种DDGS类型的平均值或实验室测量值作为潜在的营养成分预测指标。 DDGS批次来自小麦(n = 3),玉米(n = 3)或谷物混合物(n = 7)。 CDS批次主要基于小麦。这些批次是从11家欧洲乙醇工厂收集的。每个饮食处理中的六只公猪放在单独的新陈代谢笼中,并饲喂基本饮食或以DOGS或CDS代替基本饮食的30%的饮食。饲料中包括氧化铬(4 g / kg)作为外部标记。收集粪便和回肠样品,并使用指示剂方法计算日粮的表观粪便消化率(AFD)和表观回肠消化率(AID)。因此,通过差异计算了DDGS和CDS的AFD和AID值。通过多元回归分析,评估营养成分,颜色测量值和体外蛋白质值作为变量,以预测DOGS的AFD,AID和净能量(NE)值。与DOGS小麦和DOGS混合物相比,DOGS玉米样品的总能量和粗脂肪(CFAT)含量更高(P <0.001),并且红色(a *; P = 0.002)和黄色(b *; P = 0.003)更高。样品。 DDGS玉米的NE值也较高(P <0.001)。即使从相同类型的谷物中产生DDGS,DOGS样品之间的氨基酸消化率(尤其是赖氨酸)也存在很大差异。因此,每种DOGS类型均值的使用并不能很好地估算营养价值。 DOGS的NE值可以通过颜色参数b *(R-2 = 71.1; P <0.001)和CFAT(R-2 = 76.2; P <0.001)或通过组合CFAT和酸性洗涤剂纤维(R- 2 = 94.0; P <0.001)。无法为氨基酸的消化率建立良好的预测方程。 CDS样品的养分和氨基酸组成以及消化率也显示出很大差异,这限制了它们在实际猪饲料配方中的可用性。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号