...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >Subjective Likelihood and the Construal Level of Future Events: A Replication Study of Wakslak, Trope, Liberman, and Alony (2006)
【24h】

Subjective Likelihood and the Construal Level of Future Events: A Replication Study of Wakslak, Trope, Liberman, and Alony (2006)

机译:主观可能性和未来事件的制约级别:Wakslak,Trope,Liberman和Alony的复制研究(2006)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

C. J. Wakslak, Y. Trope, N. Liberman, and R. Alony (2006) examined the effect of manipulating the likelihood of future events on level of construal (i.e., mental abstraction). Over 7 experiments, they consistently found that subjectively unlikely (vs. likely) future events were more abstractly (vs. concretely) construed. This well-cited, but understudied finding has had a major influence on the construal level theory (CI,T) literature: Likelihood is considered to be 1 of 4 psychological distances assumed to influence mental abstraction in similar ways (Trope & Liberman, 2010). Contrary to the original empirical findings, we present 2 close replication attempts (N = 115 and N = 120; the original studies had N = 20 and N = 34) that failed to find the effect of likelihood on construal level. Bayesian analyses provided diagnostic support for the absence of an effect. In light of the failed replications, we present a meta-analytic summary of the accumulated evidence on the effect. It suggests a strong trend of declining effect sizes as a function of larger samples. These results call into question the previous conclusion that likelihood has a reliable influence on construal level. We discuss the implications of these findings for CLT and advise against treating likelihood as a psychological distance until further tests have established the relationship.
机译:C.J.Wakslak、Y.Trope、N.Liberman和R.Alony(2006)研究了操纵未来事件的可能性对识解水平(即心理抽象)的影响。在7个实验中,他们一致发现主观上不太可能(vs.可能)的未来事件被更抽象(vs.具体)地解释。这一被广泛引用但尚未研究的发现对识解水平理论(CI,T)文献产生了重大影响:可能性被认为是以类似方式影响心理抽象的四种心理距离中的一种(Trope&Liberman,2010)。与最初的实证结果相反,我们提出了两次紧密复制尝试(N=115和N=120;最初的研究有N=20和N=34),未能发现可能性对识解水平的影响。贝叶斯分析为没有效应提供了诊断支持。鉴于复制失败,我们对累积的证据进行了荟萃分析总结。这表明,随着大样本的增加,效应大小呈下降趋势。这些结果质疑了先前的结论,即可能性对识解水平有可靠的影响。我们讨论了这些发现对CLT的影响,并建议在进一步的测试确定这种关系之前不要将可能性视为心理距离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号